Last updated: Oct.16, 2005 1:11pm CST
This time it is personal. Rashmi Bansal, JAM editor and a popular blogger has been attacked by so-called IIPM graduates (see comments). [hat tip: Charu]
We at DesiPundit condemn IIPM and their chamcha blogs (no links offered here) for their despicable attitude. Gaurav Sabnis, a popular Indian blogger has been served a legal notice (via email) asking him to retract his statements against IIPM. Couple of days later, another blogger Varna got an idential legal notice from IIPM. More importantly, this attempted supression of freedom of speech shall not be tolerated. Kaps has issued a call to join the fight against IIPM. Bloggers all around the world have responded magnificiently. Click below for the list of bloggers and updates:
Harini 1, 2, & 3, Srini, Charu, Anshul, Amrit 1 & 2, Muthuvel, Thalassa Mikra, Jagan 1 & 2, Vijay Krishna 1, 2, & 3, Vatsan, Jo, Varna, Swaroop CH, Shivam 1 & 2, Ash 1 & 2, Abi, Jujitsu, Uma 1 & 2, Shub, Rajan, Havoc, Abhishek, Chandrachoodan 1 & 2, Kaushik, Alpha-Q, Mandar, Kaushal, Chenthil 1 & 2, Anthony, Bonatellis, Apurv, Scudie, Sriyansa, Miss J, Neha, Tablepost, Chitthacharcha, Saket, Dhananjay 1 & 2, Sriram 1 & 2, The Comic Project, Gawker, Nilu, Ian, Jabberwock, Niket, Ravikiran, Hitchiker, Vinaya, George, Ajay, Navin, Jinal, Rajkumar, Sudhish, Kitabkhana, Sunil, Falstaff, Arzan, Nitin, Sameer, Srikar, Mayank, Jitendra, Secular-Right India, Ranjan, BigBlogLog, Kamesh, Chernoff, Hitanshu, Almost Useless, Jaya Jha, TTG, Naveen, Sujatha, Veer, Nupur, Varnam, Soumyadip, Uma MD, Vishal Angry Grad Student, Pradyot, Amit Choudhary, Sandesh, MMK, Salman’s Shirt, Bharat, Nikhil K, Kaushik, Aditya, Icarus (Tamil), Infinite Circle, Ketan, Durga, Kamlesh, Pankaj, Harish, Ashish, Swarnasrikrishnan, Rahul, Kaushik-Bidisha, Srijith, Anand, I-sight, Logical Thinking, Sakshi J, Gururajan, Bhagya, Kunal, Sandeep 1 & 2, Ramanand, Satish V, Ashwin, Flying Death, Vayanasala (Malayalam), Shivangi, Govar, Shreyas, Prufrock, Unknown Indian, Prasoon, Killer Bunty, Suhail, Elne, Abhishek, Ravi, Aishwarya, Leela, The Bat, Aditya P, Rajesh B, Arnold, J.Alfred Prufrock, Kingsley, Saurabh, Ashutosh, Nilanjana 1 & 2, Shanti, Ram V, Wanderstruck, Vishwanathan, Scribbler, Vaibhav, Divya, Debashish, Sowmya 1 & 2, Shoefiend, Veena, Salwater Blues, India Blogs, DesiTrain 1, 2, & 3, Suds, Urmea, Senthil, Anshul, Lubu, Vikram, Nishi, Ravikumar, Buchu, Chandoo, Aditya A, Vatsan M, Vinayak, Manoj, aNTi, Bhaskar, Fursatiya (Hindi), Ramnish, Nirav, Tifoc, Hemanth, KM, Karthik, Aadisht, Gaurav B, Protea Spice, Transmogrifier 1, 2, & 3, Pablo Ares, Tushar, Raghunandan, Preetam P, Prabhu, Arbit Council 1, 2, & 3, Nikhil O, Emma, Desi Nole, Dinesh, Usha, Salil, Anat, Chetan, Anil, Neha M, Kuffir, Ze Rambler, Null Bit, Lakshmi, Hariprasad, @Jroller, EspiritNoir, Samy, Aekta, Gokula Krishnan, Kasthuri, Surya, Ankita, Hirak, Prithvi, Odyssey, Rithwik, Tanmay, Kirti, RK, Kiruba, MumbaiGirl Online, Mehul, Vishnupriya, Samit B, Laura, Hemangini, Sumeet, Kiran, Deepthi, Seshu, Chakra, Sandeep, Bharat, Drumster, Atanu, Invincible, Kanti, Parmanu, Freaks Inc, Arpit, Sib, Twilight Fairy, Megha, Rajesh A, Taz Snow, Rohan K, Pune Bloggers, Prakash, Nijas, Sharad, Achan, Manpreet, USC Trojan, ~J~, Jottingz, Ramses, Tushar B, Wise Donkey, Praveen, The Hissing Saint, Kanishka, Clorange, SV, Prasenjeet, Blog Mela Portal, Shrikanth, Sibyl, Technophobic, Nikhil K, Chamique, Annie, and counting…have heeded the call. Add URLs of your posts in the comments; I’ll be glad to add them to the list.
PressTalk exposes the false ranking claims by IIPM, The Arbit Council has a funny take on the exhorbitant consultancy fees demanded by IIPM director, Arindham C. I personally call upon IIPM to sue me for my words for them. Of course, the poor IIPM students aren’t to blame. PressTalk thinks that the Desi blogosphere is finally rising up to the challenge. Methinks, its still to premature but I am glad that many have taken interest in this issue. Varun, one of the earliest bloggers to take up this issue has an extended update.
Mridula does a fine job of aggregating the articles from MSM regards the mushrooming of management institutes and their tall claims. MSM isn’t actively investigating such claims when they clearly should be. Abhishek points out how the blogosphere can influence people more than traditional media.
People, please head over to their blogs and extend your full support to Rashmi, Gaurav, and other bloggers threatened by IIPM.
Update#1: It is confirmed! Gaurav Sabnis quit his job at IBM. Please note, he wasn’t fired or wasn’t compelled by his employer He quit on his own accord and I applaud him for standing up for his principles. Read his post here.
Update#2: The issue goes international. Neha has written about it on Global Voices. Amit’s post is linked by Instapundit. Ian heeds our call too. More international links appreciated. Om Malik, the broadband guru gives it a mention. Sepia Mutiny joins in. Rachel writes in from London. Shel Israel and Robert Scoble, author of business and management books do not think that Gaurav’s words were over the top and suggest that IBM should have sent a canister of gas to help IIPM burn their own laptops. Jon Lebkowsky makes a mention too. David Weinberger, co-author of the Cluetrain Manifesto and fellow at Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School picks up the thread.
Sepia Mutiny has more on the legality of boycott as a weapon. Jim Hoft aka Gateway Pundit joins in. J Angelo Racoma stumbles upon this controversy while running a search for “Thinkpad” on Google. Should IBM be worried about this? Douglas Hoffman spins a tale to include the IIPM tag. Sepia Mutiny fondly remembers their own “cease and desist” letter. The Mullers open Technorati as they do everyday and, are shocked by what they see.
Update#3: DesiPundit supporter and ace blogger, Amit Varma has summed it perfectly as why this is so important for the desi blogosphere. Michael wonders about the credibility of an institution by the quality of its supporters. Reputation is the biggest asset and IIPM seems to be losing it fast. Sulfury has a nice rhyme for them. Aparna’s limericks cannot be far behind. Michael Higgins follows up with another excellent post blasting traditional media’s excuse of losing a large advertiser.
Update#4: IIPM is already ranked 5th 2nd at the TOP on Technorati’s most-searched list. Too bad they messed with the blogosphere. Varun has a screenshot.
Update#5: PK writes in defense of IIPM. Although we disgree with it, we respect his viewpoint. PK seems to have reversed his stand and now supports Gaurav’s actions wholeheartedly. Arzan ponders on the status of the students at IIPM.
Update#6: Arzan calls up IIPM’s Toronto office and finds out that the number belongs to some Sanjeev who claims to have no affiliation with IIPM and adds, “”nothing is there because nothing worked out and its not like what they say on their website”. Bonatellis has more information on IIPM’s PR firm. Dilip D’Souza reads the fine print in IIPM ads that tells us a lot. Gawker has an excellent parody on IIPM’s facilities and placement claims. The IIPM fracas over a lassi? Dhabba has more details.
Update#7: IIPM has an entry on Wikipedia that anyone can edit? God help them now! Ravikiran has detailed instructions on how your little blog can make a difference. Vijay Krishna however is not in favor of using Wikipedia as a medium of protest.
Update#8: IIPM was suspended from Outlook’s B-school survey for allegedly fudging data provided to the survey firm Cfore. IIPM conveniently claims, “We have never believed in rankings”. Here is a screenshot. Deepak has more details, documents, and pictures on the rankings controversy.
Update#9: Varna has been served a legal notice identical to the notice sent to Gaurav Sabnis. She is requesting suggestions on how to deal with it and of course, DesiPundit and other bloggers extend their support in all forms. TechMag blows holes in IIPM’s legal notices.
Update#10: Inspite of all the ensuing melee, Abi succinctly brings our attention back to where JAM Mag and Gaurav started – false and exaggerated claims in advertising. Instead of suing bloggers, shouldn’t IIPM address these concerns first? In fact, the students at IIPM should be asking these. I try to explain what this fight against IIPM is all about.
Update#11: Why do Indian bloggers living outside India or otherwise totally unaffected by IIPM’s education standard have a problem with the current happenings. Neha’s reply is right on the dot.
Update#12: Ravi Handa has assembled a list of MSM editors contact information if at any time we wish to use it.
Update#13: Quizman finds some non-bloggers for IIPM to take legal action against. By the dates of the posts, these people have been calling IIPM’s bluff long before bloggers got into the act. Why are bloggers being singled out?
Update#14: This may be too early but Mridula goes one step further and investigates Amity Business School’s reputation. The big-picture implications of this issue of course are education business accountability. Madhukar compares the B-school rankings by different publications. No IIPM mention in any of them! As we now look beyond the IIPM issue, Pradyot has an interesting idea for creating an open source medium for aggregating and exchanging breaking news, feedback, and most importantly, freedom of speech; kinda like a mini-wiki. He also has a “Freedom of Speech” tag for us to display on our blogs.
Update#15: Charu finds Arindham Chaudhari’s bestseller in the Humorous Section at FabMall. The $24.95 question is, will he send them a legal notice too?
Update#16: Instapundit has another extended mention to the IIPM fracas. He also thinks that IIPM made a huge mistake by trying to tangle with the blogosphere. He also wishes IBM had displayed more backbone to support Gaurav’s cause.
Update#17: Naveen urges us to take a long term perspective of the IIPM event and ponders on the effect of unfettered education institutes that have sprung up in India propped up largely by the print media’s advertising.
Update#18: Jose Castillo over at Think Jose explains why supressing free speech on the Internet especially the blogosphere is not only difficult but impossible. IIPM only seems to add more fuel into the fire with each legal threat.
Update#19: Traditional media’s first mention of the IIPM fracas – Hindustan Times carries it on Page 3 in today’s Mumbai edition (Wednesday, Oct.12, 2005) [may require free registration for epaper version]. Mumbai Mirror’s Blogger’s Park column (link expired; check PDF link) features our issue prominently. Daily Pioneer, Delhi also carries the story (accessed through Google cache). Indian Express’s Mumbai Newsline has the story in today’s (October 13th 2005) edition. DNA India has an extensive article and covers all aspects admirably.
Update#20: Jeff Ooi’s ‘Freedom blog Asia’, Screenshots extensively covers the issue. The IIPM fracas now has top billing in the Malaysian blogosphere too. Madhukar Shukla adds his thoughts on Gandhi, grassroots democracy, and the blogosphere.
Update#21: Dr. Amit Kapoor aka ‘Kautilya’, Gaurav Sabnis’s professor at IIML speaks out against IIPM and Arindham Chaudhari. He has more to share regarding the defamation suit as alleged by IIPM.
Update#22: Arnab aka Great Bong is setting up I3D – Indian Institute of International Dreamers. Gawker tells us about another fight – fine-print vs. large-print. Hilarious stuff!
Update#23: Varna, the second blogger to be issued a legal notice by IIPM is not fazed and stands by her words. However, she is disillusioned by IIPM’s attitude, high-handed ways, and misplaced priorities of its students. She has our complete support.
Update#24: Arka Mukhopadhyay wants to initiate a more pro-active approach by involving Bangalore Bloggers in a protest march to the IIPM campus. Varun wonder why no legal notices today. Ah-ha! its Dusshera.
Update#25: Chandrachoodan narrates a personal incident relating to IIPM, Chennai.
Update#26: Indian Express’s Mumbai Newsline has the story in today’s (October 13th 2005) edition.
Update#27: Committee to Protect Bloggers, an international online organization is keenly following our campaign and will be alerting its members via email. Rashmi, Gaurav, and Varna may be added on their list of threatened bloggers.
Update#28: Dan Gillmor, citizen journalist advocate mentions the “clumsy corporate attack on bloggers“.
Update#29: Gaurav Sabnis’ post is #20 on Bloglines’ Most Popular Links [as of Oct.13, 2005].
Update#30: NDTV calls it “fascinating story, which has not just raised questions about claims made by private educational institutions but also about laws governing internet privacy. ” They may soon have it on TV as well. If anyone can record the show and upload it as a digital file, please send me the link.
Update#31: Kamla Bhatt has the controversy in podcast format.
Update#32: Mandar has started off excellently by trying to rein in legal help for ‘threatened bloggers’. Sudish also contacted legal expert Naavi to get an idea of the email legal notices. However, I don’t think the notices were a hoax. Shivam has the roundup on the legal terms and issues in this case. A good ready-reckoner! Metlin looks at what constitutes libel. The threats to “burn laptops” and other indicators points to IIPM. If you know anyone who can help us legally (for free), please contact us.
Update#33: Arzan does excellent investigative work and digs up information on IIPM’s ‘international’ connections. Gawker follows it up with his own investigation.
Update#34: Kiruba has designed some nice buttons for your blog to show support for Rashmi and Gaurav. Kiruba, don’t forget our dear Varna.
Update#35: Rashmi Bansal is back! She posts evidence to IIPM’s bogus claims of high ranking for their business school.
Update#36: Puneet has irrefutable proof that IIPM is spamming Google, MSN and Yahoo search engines.
Update#37: Varna intends to stop posting about IIPM and has her last post up on the subject.
Update#38: Mridula prefers Yahoo over Google to search for news regards IIPM. But she forgets Google’s latest offering – Blogsearch.
Update#39: IIPM is back as Technorati’s top search after being briefly pushed down by Apple’s Video iPod. The momentum seems to be relentless.
Update#40: Arzan has a online petition up in support of Rashmi Bansal and Gaurav Sabnis. Go sign it!
Update#41: Taking a cue from Gawker, Sameer further investigates the duplicate universities that IIPM seems to have set up all over the world.
Update#42: Bloggers are now fisking IIPM’s website faster than ever. Mahesh discovers a wierd disclaimer on their website that might effectively absolve Rashmi, Gaurav, and Varna if they added it too.
Update#43: Kiruba sure does get flashes of brilliance in the middle of the night. Nice t-shirt!
Update#44: Nirav reminds us why nipping such IIPM-esque behavior in the bud is necessary.
Update #45: Varna gives a fitting reply to A Saxena’s latest comment.
Update #46: Amit Varma points to an article, which raises questions about the credentials of IIPM’s founder.
Update#47: PressTalk has a official statement from IIPM regarding the controversy. They plan on continuing to sue people.
Update#48: Joichi Jho, Creative Commons Board Member considers this issue extremely important because seemingly the USP of this country is its open democracy.
Update#49: Dr. Amit Kapoor, Gaurav’s professor from IIM-L shares an email sent by an IIPM student. Now, this seems closer to the truth.
Update#50: Varun has an excellent response to an anonymous IIPM student commenter. Incidentally, the arguments offered by this IIPM student seem much more balanced and rational as compared to the abusive ones elsewhere but Varun fisks his arguments quite admirably. Somu has a great find – Arindham Chaudhari advocating free speech and exposing “shameless creeps who occupy public space”.
Update#51: Thalassa Mikra has an excellent online investigative piece on Dr. Malay Chaudhari and his credentials. Bonatellis has some priceless quotes from IIPM’s research website.
Update#52: Ethan Zuckerman from Global Voices has an extensive post on his personal blog and actually is a good overview of the entire controversy that is now almost a week old. Global Voices “promises to continue following this issue toward resolution”. That is heartening to hear!
Update#53: Sunil has a nice post on “how NOT to run management institutes“.
Update#54: Satya, blogosphere resident education guru writes on the trends of education advertising in India. Although wee bit unrelated, Ujval Gandhi critics Arindham C’s movie reviews. It seems there were fake reviewers too.
Update#55: Mandar’s lawyer friend, Amod Paranjpe has excellently dissected the legal notices sent by IIPM. His conclusion – we don’t have to worry about them.
Update#56: Kitabkhana has a refreshingly different post – Six things IIPM could use. Are they listening yet?
Update#57: Codelust warns bloggers to take on their “freedom of speech” right a little bit more responsibly. We understand his point and concerns but we are trying to formulate our angry thoughts into coordinated action soon. Randoms rants on individual blogs are slowly replaced by seemingly intuitive investigation (check our upates) and we believe, that the blogosphere is maturing in that sense.
Update#58: Should the blogosphere be subject to the standards of accountability and reliability of the mainstream media? Shivam comments on Sajan Veniyoor’s article in The Hoot.
Update#59: Puneet has a second part to his earlier post on IIPM spamming Google, MSN and Yahoo search engines. He tells us how we can report their behavior.
Updates#60: Mridula writes on what makes bloggers dig up facts so quickly in a story that is somewhat ignored by the traditional media.
Update#61: Smiley argues that the freedom of speech card can be used by both sides of the debate. But he’s intrigue dby the way Desipundit displayed the power of the net.
Final Update: There will be no further updates to this post. Any significant posts related to this topic will be linked as an individual post on the main page. Thanks for your support. We are back to regular programming. Feel free to add your post URLs pertaining to this topic in the comments.
You can look independently at IIPM-related blog posts on Technorati, Google Blog Search, and Ice Rocket.
Last but not the least, this is the blog effect:

Comments
451 comments. Leave your comment »
Jagan
Oct 9th, 2005 at 12:18 am | #
I am not in anyway affiliated with IIPM.
But I am interested in the concepts of FREE SPEECH as well as the misconception that free speech need not come with responsibilities.
IIPM’s full page advertisements irritate me with their nonsensical uncouth design and layout. It sucks. It is not representative of a top class institution IIPM claims itself to be. It is an example of the worst aesthetics, appeal, approach and typeset a advt. professional can come up with.
The Information contained in it is not comprehensive to read at a glance, understandable without effort nor coherent.
The Advertisement is cluttered with so much text with no clear topical organisation, sentences thrown hapazardly with no regard for context, no page layout or stylesheets to go with them, in short, it looks like a Kidnapper’s ransom note. I bet it was designed on Microsoft Word.
The Advertisement design tells me more about IIPM than the writing in it. The tone comes off as DESPERATE and its self-comparisions with IIMs childish.
All these only prove one point: That the IIPM are not media sawvy, have no sense of marketing and that they are not definetely India-class, let alone world class.
Their marketing campaign strategy seems to be simple: To bombard all newspapers with huge advertisements with lots of promises, oooph factors, jargons etc. Period. It is just like the sex and violence movies made for the front benchers.
Having said that, Serious Blogging is still in its infancy in India now.
‘Rather gate’ fiasco of Littlegreenfootballs kind of fantastic Blogosphere revolutions are still a long way to go. So at present, Bloggers must be extra careful not to take things egoistically and vengefully.
Before posting, give your thoughts a night’s sleep. And post very responsibly.
I urge that this IIPM issue not turn into a pissing competition. So may I propose a few ground rules?
1. Students who are studying AT PRESENT at IIPM depend solely on the reputation of the institute for ther placements. Your posts should be eloquent enough not to damage the reputation of the institute ipso facto. That is, don’t attack the reputation of the Institute, but rather the post should reflect the aim of placing well researched and supportable facts and facts alone without much explaination, similies and sarcasm to decorate it.
2. Facts in a straight forward way can enhance credibility. Don’t resort to ad-homi. Just because one is posting the truth does not automatically give him/her the right to call names. You may be right, but no need to attack the persona opposing your view.
3. If anybody affiliated with IIPM wishes to refute any of the points, a fair chance and equal coverage (frontpage or focuslight) be given to him/her/them. In fact, since the position of the blog writing on IIPM is known, the refutation points should be made still more prominent then the postings supportive of the blog.
4. Civility even if missing from the other side will point to who is automatically right.
5. Every side should endeavor to get the high moral gound. Gandhi and the non-violence movement won exactly and solely because of its total monopoly of the high moral gound.
6. When you are giving an opinion, make it clear that it is your opinion. No body can sue you for your opinions, however and whatever they might be.
But if you try to promote your opinions in the garb of gospel truth, that is liable for slander and libel.
Any facts if presented along with references would be welcome to the whole audience.
Lastly, please don’t screw this whole issue up that it appears skewed in the main-press/media. As such professional journalists are pretty worried about the pyjamas clad blogosphere enroaching their turf. Don’t give them a chance to malign us and make us look irresponsible, undependable and merry-go-blabbering/firing. This is serious for the future credibility of the Blogosphere to stand up to the fourth estate.
Disclaimer: Everything above is my opinion which may be facts. I do not claim them to be facts as such.
Patrix
Oct 9th, 2005 at 2:44 am | #
Jagan,
I get your drift. I hope better sense prevails. I just don’t want the blogosphere with its limitations to be intimidated by big business who are clearly misleading the public. Blogosphere in India neither has threatened journalism nor aspires to replace it. Blogging can be the purest form of voicing out personal opinions, which is exactly what is happening.
I am willing to post a link to a response from IIPM as long as it comes through authenticated channels and uses civil language.
Varna
Oct 9th, 2005 at 7:38 am | #
I study in Delhi and am witness to their poor standard of education in adition to their exorbitant fees. Whole heartedly suppost Rashmi, Gaurav and others!
shub
Oct 9th, 2005 at 2:17 pm | #
ridiculous to say the least! with all the attempts at “defending” IIPM, the “bloggers” slinging mud at rashmi and co. are just doing us all a favor.
Its nice to know that of late,the blogging community’s image has been changing from one of being trivial, and a waste of time…to another voice of the masses..
Waiting to see if any of this hits the news…and how the bad publicity will affect IIPM…
good luck to Rashmi and co.
shub
Oct 9th, 2005 at 2:51 pm | #
posted. http://makingpplsmile.blogspot.com/2005/10/cos-sometimes-you-simply-cant-bear-to.html
Havoc
Oct 9th, 2005 at 10:51 pm | #
This is the most ridiculous thing I have come across in a long time.. and that includes the US presidential elections.
IIPM calls itself a management instution !!! I think it needs some PR classes and not from IIPM.
Thalassa Mikra
Oct 9th, 2005 at 11:11 pm | #
I don’t know if you guys have noticed this, but I thought it was an interesting phenomenon. Arindam Chaudhuri’s name has been spelt variously in different blog posts about IIPM, ranging from Chowdhury, Chaudhary, Chowdhary, etc. However, in every newbie blog set up to defend IIPM, his name has invariably been spelt correctly, i.e., Arindam Chaudhuri. Coincidence? I think not!! Obviously Arindam makes sure his minions get his name right when they write blog posts defending IIPM.
abhishek
Oct 9th, 2005 at 11:14 pm | #
referenced to at:
http://abhishek.weblogs.us/archives/47/iipm-the-crap-institute/
Vijay Krishna
Oct 10th, 2005 at 1:27 am | #
Nice observation, Thalassa. I mis-spelt his name myself.
Ravages
Oct 10th, 2005 at 2:08 am | #
I’m in. IIPM’s behaviour suck big time. But that was to be expected from people who claim a purple building in a slum is a world-class campus with landscaped gardens.
http://www.selectiveamnesia.org/2005/10/10/iipm-and-its-bunch-of-fake-lewd-bloggers/
mandar
Oct 10th, 2005 at 2:50 am | #
Going by the commnets on Rashmi’s blog by (alleged) IIPM students, IIPM stands to lose much more than Rashmi or Gaurav. IIPM’s credibility, morality, and ethics are in question here. The blogging community is firmly on their side.
There’s maybe not much we can all do, but we can definitely help spread the word about this institution’s claims and its uncouth students.
I have posted about this here: A Call to Arms.
Kaushal Karkhanis
Oct 10th, 2005 at 3:19 am | #
Count me in too! I fully support Rashmi’s views and freedom of speech. If IIPM wants to clarify, they should do so publicly. JAM has been around for 10 years and there’s no doubt about their integrity and honesty. The 125 Crore lawsuit against Gaurav is a ridiculous joke!
Tony
Oct 10th, 2005 at 4:09 am | #
many things have happened in the weekend i guess. Just learnt it today morning.. Lets all join the fight.
How dare they attack a blogger.
Tony
Oct 10th, 2005 at 4:26 am | #
BTW anybody noticed the fact that in the so called comments left by IIPM students and alumni, none of them could ever pin point on a particular point in the article and give a genuine defense againts any of the Truths againts thier false claims. Their whole effort is self defeating I believe.
K
Oct 10th, 2005 at 4:39 am | #
I have never doubted the fact that IIPM is like any of the other hundreds of MBA schools in the country. It might even be better than several of the crappier ones. However, what Rashmi has done is just ‘expose’ using some very basic journalism – AC’s tall claims. I don’t see how that is bad or wrong and why the blogs should be attacked by minions of this man. In fact, I find the comments on some posts (including a very funny threat to me) funny and should not be taken seriously. But I repeat, this is not against the students over at IIPM, in fact I positively pity those guys. But its got more to do with that ponytailed ‘guru’ of sorts.
As for personal attacks – the man named his son Che Kabir (really, I don’t make such things up) because he wanted his son to be a revolutionary like Che but peaceful like Kabir. What can one say about things like that?
I wish AC actually knew who many of these ‘insignificant’ bloggers were.
Bonatellis
Oct 10th, 2005 at 6:01 am | #
Ref: http://daytimeruminations.blogspot.com/2005/10/paying-to-create-myths.html
Anon
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:08 am | #
Gaurav Sabnis lost his job at IBM today.
All of you who want to fight against IIPM, please put together a few hundred rupees each for him – he has to pay off his EMI on a car loan & house loan, and delay his marriage plans.
Will you join the fight please, and play for Gaurav?
IIPM Student
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:14 am | #
We think IIPM rocks – 3000 of us current students, and many thousand alumni, love the institute and are grateful for the enormous value add of the MBA program.
If anyone wants to discuss this, we’d love to meet with you. Maurya Sheraton, this Sunday? 10 AM ?
But don’t run about shooting your mouth off in blogspace with no idea of what you are saying. Your jealousy and envy is clear and evident in your words, which have no factual basis.
Those who choose to go ahead, we will respond with equally irresponsible posts and blogs… and we will win.
GAURAV SABNIS LOST HIS JOB AT IBM SALES TODAY, DUE TO THE LEGAL CASES AGAINST HIM BY IIPM.
IIPM Delhi Student Council
Ex-IIPM (2004)
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:32 am | #
I went to IIPM Delhi and my life was ruined. I worked with HLL as a SALES rep. And earned about 17,500 for the first one year!!! IIPM is one of the biggest fraud institutes!
And as for Gaurav Sabnis. He’s a brave chap. The inside story is that Gaurav was a guy of principles and chose to leave IBM.. Cause IBM had no guts to stand up to IIPM. (All bloody corporate politics!!!!)
Thanks God for chaps like Gaurav.. I don’t wnant others to suffer like I have.
Vulturo
Oct 10th, 2005 at 12:52 pm | #
Check this out. The right noises are definitely being made
KirkH
Oct 10th, 2005 at 1:46 pm | #
For your info: Instapundit, one of the biggest and most respected blogs in America just linked to the IndiaUncut post.
Radhakrishnan C Nair
Oct 10th, 2005 at 1:58 pm | #
I strongly support each and every blogger in this war against IIPM Vs. Blog Community…
By the way, does anyone has any information about the authenticity of ICFAI?? Can u pls tell me if this university is good?
plus ultra
Oct 10th, 2005 at 2:07 pm | #
I salute Gaurav on his principled stand, but I have one nagging thought, though.
I am sure that IBM is not such a pussilanimous organisation to be cowed down by such juvenile threats, nor can their awesome reputation be marred by stray and imbecilic acts of some misguided and gullible students of an organisation of questionable credentials.
Did Guarav seriously believe that IIPM would have carried out their threat ? They wouldn’t have dared. It would have brought them unfavourable publicity and invited public curiosity and scrutiny. If he had not blinked first in the eyeball to eyeball encounter, and had simply called their bluff, IIPM would have beaten a hasty retreat. I am sure that a values-driven organisation like IBM would have supported him. IIPM would have been exposed further.
But Gaurav, I respect your decision.
Sakshi
Oct 10th, 2005 at 2:18 pm | #
Gaurav Sabnis has done us proud. The man stand by his beliefs and keeps his faith. Good Luck to you man…and remember WE ARE ALL WITH YOU.
pkbhat
Oct 10th, 2005 at 2:59 pm | #
My opinion: In defence of IIPM
gawker
Oct 10th, 2005 at 3:00 pm | #
IIPM students to burn degree certificates to protest defamation of institute
ME..
Oct 10th, 2005 at 3:38 pm | #
also just happened to read through gaurav’s blog..
what IIPM is doing is ridiculous and sooo anti democratic.. threatning IBM’s reputation for their employee exercising his right to freedom of expression..
maybe its time i switch my previous words back..
something beyond just publishing words on blogs needs to be done about it..!!
im soooo sorry for what lies in future for IIPM..
Jagan Mohan
Oct 10th, 2005 at 4:01 pm | #
I think many IIPM don’t seem to grasp the crux of the matter.
It is NOT about IIPM. Not whether IIPM is really a good institute or nor.
But rather, it is a matter of FREE SPEECH.
IIPM tries to arm twist Gaurav into silence… and succeeds.
The online community will never forgive any monied huge organisation from censoring ordinary people and getting away with it.
If you want to help IIPM, just STFU. or suffer the consequences thereof.
Mridula
Oct 10th, 2005 at 4:03 pm | #
Shreyas, please can you leave personalized comments? And not just cut and paste this comment on any blog?
~j~
Oct 10th, 2005 at 4:12 pm | #
Gaurav Sabnis, i bow before you! by your action, you have shown that you’re a much bigger person than a so-called institution. keep up the good work. thanx for teaching us a thing or two!
i’ve been following links to this issue since reading Rashmi’s post. i’m surprised how its not all over the news yet…
Arnav
Oct 10th, 2005 at 5:20 pm | #
I had made a couple of posts earlier on my blog about IIPM. This is the latest (http://seainside.blogdrive.com/archive/74.html) that I have made after going through the series of posts on various blogs written in support of this issue. Gaurav’s resignation is unfortunate, but what is worse is that a ‘management institute’ doesn’t have any problems with behaving in the utterly shameless manner that it is behaving in.
One hardly needs proof to see that there’s something rotten in IIPM, it’s obvious from the immaturity with which they have responded.
Patrix
Oct 10th, 2005 at 5:30 pm | #
Cross-posting comments, as Andy and Shreyas have done, will not be tolerated and will be deleted instantly. Commenting on any one blog is enough. If you want to comment here, write your original and personal thoughts.
Ajay
Oct 10th, 2005 at 5:32 pm | #
I’d like to give my support to Gaurav. A sad incident, all of this. I didn’t post much, but here goes:
http://ajayvb.blogspot.com/2005/10/former-coep-and-electronics-department.html
Navin
Oct 10th, 2005 at 5:36 pm | #
http://free-blog-site.com/navin/archive/2005/10/10/84546.aspx
Here goes my post on the same.
I am going to email few famous bloggers to create more awareness on the same.
Jinal Shah
Oct 10th, 2005 at 5:54 pm | #
In full support:
I have sent the necessary links and relevant information to the South Asian Journalists Assocaition, headed at Columbia University. I have also posted the story, the links and my own opinion on my blog at, http://stylestation.typepad.com
Please let me know if there is any other way I can help.
Jinal Shah
Cipher
Oct 10th, 2005 at 6:41 pm | #
In full support for Freedom of speech….
http://cryptologist.blogspot.com/2005/10/wtf.html
Suderman
Oct 10th, 2005 at 7:14 pm | #
Neat campaign guys!
I’ve done my two cents in my blog.
http://sudhishkamath.blogspot.com/
Prashant Mullick
Oct 10th, 2005 at 8:02 pm | #
Om Malik has the story too!
Hurree Babu
Oct 10th, 2005 at 8:12 pm | #
You guys are doing a great job. Wanted to ask if there’s any practical help Gaurav needs, in terms of finding another job or finding legal assistance; someone mentioned setting up a defence fund for him–any details would be welcome.
Added my two bits at Kitabkhana:
http://kitabkhana.blogspot.com/2005/10/free-speech-and-iipm.html
sunil
Oct 10th, 2005 at 8:50 pm | #
My post is up, here:
http://balancinglife.blogspot.com/2005/10/where-mind-is-without-fear.html
Also, if Rashmi or Gaurav need legal help….please let us know.
Falstaff
Oct 10th, 2005 at 9:27 pm | #
I couldn’t resist. Here’s my two cents worth:
http://2×3x7.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-who.html
Also, I’m curious. Just how many laptops does IIPM buy from IBM every year? If we all promise not to buy IBM products ever again (you’d think bloggers would be a key target market for them) unless they tell IIPM to stuff it, would they listen, I wonder?
arZan
Oct 10th, 2005 at 9:43 pm | #
I blogged on it here
To further take this case, I called up the telephone number listed on their contact page for their IIPM’s Toronto Research Center, Canada; which is listed at The Indian Institute of Planning & Management; Suite 806; 150 Cosburn Avenue, Toronto: M4J2L9; CANADA Phone: +1-416-424-4649
All I get is a recorded message followed by a human voice speaking the seven digit number. What is this, a bucket shop ?? Does anyone familiar with Toronto know where this is ?
OK now this is big……
Just as I finished typing this sentence, my cell rings and a person by the name of Sanjeev calls back saying that I had called his telephone and he was returning the call. I said that I had called because this telephone number was posted on their site and I wanted to find out more about the institute. He categorically told me that they had nothing to do with IIPM. I asked him if there was a center there and he said “nothing is there because nothing worked out and its not like what they say on their website�.
veerjain
Oct 10th, 2005 at 10:29 pm | #
I strongly suppost Rashmi, Gaurav and others!.
veerjain
Oct 10th, 2005 at 10:32 pm | #
I strongly support the cause. The IIPM is false and misleading students and should be banned.
Sameer
Oct 10th, 2005 at 10:36 pm | #
Posted about theManagement-gate on my blog.
Vijay Krishna
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:17 pm | #
Gaurav Sabnis, you are a hero!
But we must thank Arindam Chaudhuri profusely. His genius is beyond compare. Through his actions, he has united all of India’s (real) bloggers! Thanks a lot, Arindam. You are a hero too!
Mayank
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:24 pm | #
I feel strongly for Rashmi and Gaurav and hope this becomes a watershed and an eye-opening event for all these sleazy institutes.
Jitendra Mohan
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:44 pm | #
my post in support:
http://jitendramohan.blogspot.com/2005/10/truth-is-aboslute.html
Bonatellis
Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:58 pm | #
More on the Guru … ref: http://daytimeruminations.blogspot.com/2005/10/more-about-guru.html
TTG
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:21 am | #
Add me to the list!
http://25worldcountry.blogspot.com/2005/10/little-solidarity.html
Anantha
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:33 am | #
i find this whole issue, silly. instead of taking JAM’s article sportingly, IIPM has over reacted. and now it’s courting a PR disaster by needlessly hounding gaurav sabnis. i am with the rest of the bloggers on this issue. i’ve expressed my opinion with a rhyme, as low brow as IIPM’s reaction, to this episode. go here for the same —> http://sulfury.blogspot.com/2005/10/bschool-that-lost-its-cool.html
Madhav
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:41 am | #
Haven’t seen this on the journals I read at LJ (LiveJournal) yet. I’ve posted about it, hopefully it will gather momentum there too.
Jahnvi
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:53 am | #
This is really disgusting. First the vicious personal attacks on Rashmi Bansal and now hounding Gaurav Sabnis. Threatening to burn IBM Thinkpads etc sounds really cheap and desperate.
IIPM, how about backing up your claims with the right evidence instead of resorting to such cheap tactics?
Swar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:09 am | #
Our country needs spine. I support Guarav Sabnis. Add me.
Nirav
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:13 am | #
I strongly applaud the courage shown by Gaurav to stick to his ideals and principles and not buckle under pressure. Also the initiative by Desipundit to unite the scattered voices on this issue is commendable. My thoughts:
http://mehtanirav.blogspot.com/2005/10/lord-of-wrongs.html
TAC
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:32 am | #
I don’t have any facts on IIPM while I support some of the ranting against them, but most of all I’m just gearing up to watch the great big fight! Indian Blogosphere vs. IIPM!
W00t! we r0×0rs!
Akshay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:44 am | #
Here what I’ve got to say on these sad state of affairs.
http://trivialmatters.blogspot.com/2005/10/where-fuck-is-big-media.html
Akshay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:46 am | #
Add me to the list.
http://trivialmatters.blogspot.com/2005/10/where-fuck-is-big-media.html
Mridula
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:57 am | #
A small but growing debate has started at India Mike too.
India Mike
India Mike is a travel related forum but the excellent people there are game for anything related to India. The readership is wide in terms of global geographical reach.
Aditya Kuber
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:11 am | #
IIPM always seemed shady and the amount they splurged on adertising would have to be inversely proportional to the quality. You don’t see the IIMs advertise about magazines and books and “How great the dean is” do they? I have some points here.
Durga
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:29 am | #
My blog on this:
http://www.dpsmiles.org/blog/?p=93
Ketan
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:30 am | #
Few…Lost half of my day just reading peoples post and blogs..Wat the hell….Been dreaming of xposing these shit heads for long now..
Glad somebdy took the initiative while i was asleep.
Here goes I: http://aloud-thinking.blogspot.com/
Akshay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:35 am | #
Add me to the list.
http://trivialmatters.blogspot.com/2005/10/where-fuck-is- big-media.html/
Akshay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:37 am | #
Here my take on the the sad state of affairs.
http://trivialmatters.blogspot.com/2005/10/where-fuck-is- big-media.html/
Akshay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:44 am | #
http://trivialmatters.blogspot.com/2005/10/where-fuck-is-big-media.html
Pankaj
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:48 am | #
Hello Patrix,
I had read about the IIPM story at desipundit earlier. However, this morning at India Uncut, I read Amit Varma’s post on it and got the shock of my life when I came to know about Gauravs resignation.
Its inspiring to know about a guy who would take a stand and not compromise on values. This act alone will make others to join in now.
You are doing a great job. Do keep up the campaign alive.
My post on it: http://writepad.blogspot.com/2005/10/some-times-we-take-stand.html
Thanks and Regards.
Chandrashekhar Bhosle
Oct 11th, 2005 at 3:36 am | #
I don’t personally don’t think Gaurav should have resigned but I respect him for sticking to his principles and support him fully.
http://www.livejournal.com/users/freegeek/159378.html
mandar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 3:37 am | #
All I can say is, “Vinash kaletu vipareeth buddhi.” If the time is bad one loses the ability to discern between the right or wrong. From what happened earlier and from what happened between yesterday and today, I doubt, if IIPM ever had a sense of what’s right or wrong.
My post on today’s developments: Because a Bully said, I’m Going to Twist Your Arm.
Ashish Hanwadikar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 3:47 am | #
This is really horrible. I applaud Gaurav’s courage and also stand with the rest of the Indian bloggers. It is more about our choice to speak out truth at a cost of our reputation rather than about freedom of speech. See my post on my stand on this.
Bidisha
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:19 am | #
Doing my bit. My post -
http://kaushik-bidisha.blogspot.com/2005/10/support.html
Bidisha
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:26 am | #
I don’t know if I duplicated my comment, I am having some comp problems..
Just apalled at the whole affair. How can students even think of such acts of vandalism, without reason, logic or any professional behavior whatsoever.
My support at –
http://kaushik-bidisha.blogspot.com/2005/10/support.html
Sakshi
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:35 am | #
Here is Aparna’s support to the cause Truth Vs. Clout
And my goggle bombing support
Indobj
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:46 am | #
It is really inspiring to see so many supporters of the good out here. Let us keep up the great work.
My 2 cents:
http://indobj.blogsome.com/2005/10/11/where-is-freedom-of-speech/
Seema
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:50 am | #
I have been following Gaurav’s and Rashmi’s posts and was shocked by the immature and defensive reactions of the IIPM guys. What happened to Freedom of Speech?
Linked you and Gaurav on my blog… My complete support to your fight against these guys.
Seema
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:55 am | #
Sorry, forgot my blog link
Pradyot Ghate
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:59 am | #
I am in support of Rashmi and Gaurav. My post full of sarcasm can be found at http://adjournment.blogspot.com/2005/10/top-five-reasons.html
Bhagya
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:59 am | #
Pledging my support. Put up a link on my blog. Have been following this issue since yesterday.
Kunal Sawardekar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 5:03 am | #
This is a quite an outrage. The IIPM junta ought to be jailed or something. But respect to Gaurav for his pricipled stand.
My two cents (paise??):
http://azatlan.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm.html
Shreyas Ghuge
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:01 am | #
@patrix..
read ur response to my comment here and then updated myself on this issuea t others blogs.. came across a rather funny line of words posted by u on the comments of PK’s blog.. u say there “what we are fighting against is legal and physcial threats against individuals who write contrary opinions about IIPM. This fight is basically a protection of freedom speech.”
what u did with my comment here kinda contradicts ur words.. u may justify ur actions by pronouncing that this is ur personal space.. i agree..
and hence my sincere apologies for cross commenting from rashmi’s blog.. the reason why i did so was because the thoughts were the same and hence preferred to keep the same words.. wish ud read beyond the first few lines..
i am totally in support of this fight against IIPM.. i tried to keep an unbiased stand on this previously, but the way IIPM has displayed their standards in the way they reacted to gaurav’s post, is very unprofessional and immature..
i maintain that it was very undemocratic also..
the point that wanted to put forward was to call for an action beyond words.. let us not just sit on the sidelines and pledge support to rashmi and gaurav..
the immense support that we have garnered through blogs is overwhelming and commendable.. but now lets use that strength ((of course adding some more in the way..)) to take this fight face on..
the only reason i say this is because blogs are not yet a part of the mainstream media and hence all these efforts of linking support are not recognised..
lets act.. rather than just speak..
my words at my place.. please stop by at http://usandthem.rediffblogs.com
thank you..
Shreyas
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:03 am | #
@patrix..
read ur response to my comment here and then updated myself on this issuea t others blogs.. came across a rather funny line of words posted by u on the comments of PK’s blog.. u say there “what we are fighting against is legal and physcial threats against individuals who write contrary opinions about IIPM. This fight is basically a protection of freedom speech.”
what u did with my comment here kinda contradicts ur words.. u may justify ur actions by pronouncing that this is ur personal space.. i agree..
and hence my sincere apologies for cross commenting from rashmi’s blog.. the reason why i did so was because the thoughts were the same and hence preferred to keep the same words.. wish ud read beyond the first few lines..
i am totally in support of this fight against IIPM.. i tried to keep an unbiased stand on this previously, but the way IIPM has displayed their standards in the way they reacted to gaurav’s post, is very unprofessional and immature..
i maintain that it was very undemocratic also..
the point that wanted to put forward was to call for an action beyond words.. let us not just sit on the sidelines and pledge support to rashmi and gaurav..
the immense support that we have garnered through blogs is overwhelming and commendable.. but now lets use that strength ((of course adding some more in the way..)) to take this fight face on..
the only reason i say this is because blogs are not yet a part of the mainstream media and hence all these efforts of linking support are not recognised..
lets act.. rather than just speak..
my words at my place.. please stop by at http://usandthem.rediffblogs.com
thank you..
elne
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:08 am | #
We’ve probably gotten quite a lot of “dollars” by now (after all the “two cents” that the bloggers have put in) but here are mine:
http://whydoubothercominghere.blogspot.com/2005/10/what-happened-when-logic-died.html
Satish Vijaykumar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:08 am | #
May god give Gaurav all the strength to beat the shit out of IIPM and thier cronnies…
Rashmi and everyone at JAM you guys surely rock on….
bart
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:15 am | #
My salutes to Gaurav at http://updownsouth.blogspot.com.
IIPM, your chickens do not count before / after they hatch!!!
pkbhat
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:47 am | #
I had supported Rashmi by commenting on her post when it was posted. *In defence of IIPM* was posted before reading Gaurav’s post about blackmail and strong arm methods used by IIPM Delhi students council and Gaurav’s very courageous and principled decision to resign from IBM sales.I have personally apologised to Gaurav for writing that post defending IIPM.The post was not in defence of filthy comments aginst Rashmi or Threats of IIPM Delhi student Council to Gaurav and his employer IBM.I feel sorry for the IIPM students because with this one action they have demeaned themselves in the eyes of potential recruiter.Even in the post i had supported Rashmi and Gaurav’s right to comment/opine on IIPM’s activities. I once again extend my support to them.-PK
Deepak Shenoy
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:52 am | #
I’m on the blog list too – I restarted writing what was an OLD blog, starting with this entry:
http://theunknownindian.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-are-they-for-real.html
And it’s about this IIPM thing.
R Sharma
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:01 am | #
Guys, Sepia Mutiny has picked it up…
http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/002346.html
great job guys, keep going.
With you as always
Varun
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:27 am | #
IIPM is now the most searched word in Technorati
Prasoon
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:34 am | #
The blogosphere stands united.
As suggested elsewhere, I’d recommend that we bloggers file a counter-suit to IIPM’s claim and as Gaurav had already had to resign, we have an advantage.
Lets do it folks…
btw, the link to my support lies here – http://flexedviews.blogspot.com/2005/10/blogosphere-unites.html
Mridula
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:37 am | #
IIPM is the top search word over Technorati!!!
Rajesh
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:47 am | #
Absolutely admire Gaurav’s courage and commitment. I dont know much about IIPM, but whatever comments (even from IIPM supports!!) I have read, lead me to think that there is a problem with this institute.
One more supporter for the right to free speech!
Suhail Kazi
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:47 am | #
Laptop warriors.
Killer Bunty
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:50 am | #
Gaurav you rock dude. One needs balls to do what you did. Am putting up a link to my blog in your support:
http://killerbunty.blogspot.com
Aishwarya
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:00 am | #
I just blogged about this Here
Ravi
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:02 am | #
“Any institution however mediocre can improve with time. A commitment on providing relevant education over a period of time is bound to bring results.”
“But this big bully has put its weight in crushing any voice raised against its false claims. This clears all doubts. If the promoters itself have no sense of ethics or responsibility, there is no hope for this institute.”
Abhishek
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:03 am | #
My own piece of support :
http://crossstyx.blogspot.com/2005/10/remember-david-won.html
Vijay Krishna
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:08 am | #
As of now, IIPM is the most searched term on Technorati! Long live free speech. Thank you, Mr. Chaudhuri!
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:56 am | #
much has been said already. i extend my full support to Gaurav and Rashmi.
gawker
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:02 am | #
IIPM to inaugurate new answering machine in Japan
Anjali Ramachandran
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:24 am | #
I fully support Rashmi and Gaurav. IIPM’s advertisements have made me wonder about what they really do, in the past, and now that I know what nonsense and arm-twisting they are upto, I intend my voice to be heard. I have posted on the issue today.
life's desolate attic
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:26 am | #
“As of now, IIPM is the most searched term on Technorati!”
As a logical progression, how about google-bombing IIPM to desipundit and this sticky post? Now which blogger-hacker is upto this challenge?
Leela
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:34 am | #
A word of support here…
Varna
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:49 am | #
Hi All…
Just thought I would let you know about another post in connection with IIPM and such on my blog. I am willing to help organise print publicity and a lawyer if anyone is interested….
http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/some-reflections-on-free-speech.html
Vaibhav
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:49 am | #
IIPM’s response is what will be hurting its already dubious reputation… like Michael Higgins said, either “these are idiots (we can never rule that out)” or that “institution is fairly desperate”…
Vaibhav.
Shanti
Oct 11th, 2005 at 10:20 am | #
Late to the party, but here is my contribution! http://www.madhoo.com/archives/2005/10/stifling_the_freedom.php
Veena
Oct 11th, 2005 at 10:39 am | #
Here you go..http://onayahuasca.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-who.html
Jude
Oct 11th, 2005 at 10:50 am | #
My mail to IIPM at the bottom.. Any lawyers here? Can’t JAM and Gaurav sue for harrassment? I think we in this country are too scared in our unfamiliarity with the legal system.. If this had happened someplace else, IIPM wouldn’t have had the balls to send such notices in print.. Lets team up and make sure they can never do this again.. What’s needed is legal advice .. I havent been able to go through all posts, and someone might have suggested this before.. But this IS the way to go now..
Jude
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: jude d’souza
Date: Oct 10, 2005 9:02 PM
Subject: Hi
To: legal@iipm.edu
Hi you assholes
You cant get away by slapping legal notices on people. You will soon see your letters up on prominent news sites, so be careful about what you send to people. Freedom of speech exists in this country whether you want it to exist or not. I think that all MBAs are loads of crap and people like Mr. Arindam and other gurus who write stupid books should be sued for the number of trees they kill by their drivel. Lets us see you fight this out. Buy me a ringside ticket and some popcorn.
Jude D’Souza
Jude
Oct 11th, 2005 at 11:01 am | #
Lookie what I found .. for inspiration ..
http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
Ashutosh
Oct 11th, 2005 at 11:26 am | #
Yes, this is quite a travesty. But IIPM ironically has brought it upon themselves. They underestimated the freedom of speech inherent in the blogsphere.
Here’s my two cents on it:
http://ashujo.blogspot.com/2005/10/getting-facts.html
Thanks
Sanjay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 11:43 am | #
I’m wondering where Arindham C. get his funding?
1. His bollywood movie “Rok Sako To Rok Lo” probably cost Rs 100 crores to produce. It became the first full-length feature film to premiere on a wireless cellular network – Airtel’s. Subscribers to India’s Airtel service apparently got to watch a streaming version of this film on their phones on December 9th, 2004. Not sure how much extra he paid for this. The movie itself crashed & burned at the box office.
2. His book “The Great Indian Dream” was very heavily marketed & must have cost a fortune. During my last trip to India, I used to buy the ten leading Indian print dailies on a regular basis to get a flavour of developments in the country. One of the things that caught my eye was the ubiquitous presence of 8×10 ads pushing the “The Great Indian Dream” in virtually every newspaper. Costs of advertising alone would have been in the tens of crores. He claimed to have received a 7-figure advance from the publisher for this book but revealed to The Hindu that he never got the actual money. It was just an advertising gimmick.
3. Arindham C. is supposedly the founder of PlanMan Consulting “which is now one of the fastest growing Indian Management Consulting Firms” with offices in Canada & the USA. Unfortunately, PlanMan Consulting’s URl at http://www.planmanconsulting.com is a dead end!
4. Arindham C. is the founder of “Great Indian Dream Foundation” whose mission includes ridding India of “its inhuman indignities” & envisions that “this dream take the form of a revolution”. Odd to hear naxalite rhetoric emerging from the mouth of a so-called management guru. Another interesting point: The GIDF website prominently displays (source: http://www.gidf.org/mission.html) a picture of Sachin Tendulkar, who appears to be endorsing the Foundation.
shoefiend
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:13 pm | #
Here’s to freedom of speech
Srijith
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:24 pm | #
David Weinberger picks this up too.
Sudhakar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:34 pm | #
I strongly condemn various attacks phased by IIPM guys on Rashmi. Whatever is the case, IIPM should behave in its perimeter of dignity and fame (If it has). I am very much concerned on the way they attacked gaurav. It’s a kind of “Sikhandi” strategy which was used in Mahabharata to kill bheeshma. We should feel ashamed to have such B-Graduate in india.
km
Oct 11th, 2005 at 12:43 pm | #
Guys,
Hit me up for the Fight Club. Excellent coverage by DP. But let’s keep the tone civil and moderate, lest we become that which we hate the most blah blah blah.
I think comments like “This will teach them not to mess with the Blogosphere” are not going to help the cause at all.
My two-hundredths here
Krishna
Urmea
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:03 pm | #
My two cents here.
Rishabh Manocha
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:14 pm | #
and here are my 2 cents.
Varna
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:22 pm | #
Some news that has really annoyed me on the IIPM front:
http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/yet-another-legal-notice.html
Saurabh Jayawant
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:35 pm | #
Am not much of an issues blogger,but this one really got me pissed off like hell. Gaurav and Rashmi have my support as well, in this campaign against usurpers of freedom. My infintesmal bit for support
http://waughpath.blogspot.com/2005/10/of-right-way-and-easy-way.html
J. Alfred Prufrock
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:42 pm | #
Flavour of the month, evidently.
Much as I respect Gaurav Sabnis’ decision, he shouldn’t have ‘blinked first’.
Good point from Sanjay – where DOES Arindam C’s money come from? I’m sure ‘therein lies a tale’.
My 86 Paise (at current exchange rates) here -
http://sadoldbong.blogspot.com/
J.A.P.
Kunal Thakar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:49 pm | #
Arnold D’souza says : http://fairmaidenintrouble.blogspot.com/2005/10/i-feel-sick.html
The support for gaurav and rashmi is amazing. I want to see how those mindf***ed jerks at IIPM react to this.
Rajesh Barnwal
Oct 11th, 2005 at 1:55 pm | #
The discussion on IIPM’s “tall claims” is yet another manifestation, if it was needed, of the exemplary service being provided by the blogosphere.
The so-called free press who get benefited from full page advertisements could hardly be expected to find hard facts and publish them. No wonder, they prefer to devote more of their print space on talks about the length of Shania’s skirt or the number of kisses performed by Mallika!
http://rajeshbarnwal.blogspot.com/2005/10/when-fools-are-around-do-wise-cunning.html
Aditya Pethe
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:08 pm | #
Well, an extremely bizzare,sad event! Have linked to this here:
http://thekobra.blogspot.com/2005/10/hats-off-to-u-mate_10.html#links
Vinay
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:32 pm | #
My 2 cents:
Put up a column in leading newspapers against IIPM – of course with Sabnis’ story.
usha
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:45 pm | #
i have my own doubts about IIPM’s claims to fame. But I am rather taken aback by the response Rashmi had to face – downright disgusting and attrocious. If they really have the balls, why dont they come up clean. Show us the figures, show us Mr. Chaudhari’s marksheets, tell us where he is from and show us the placement records.
Lubu
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:53 pm | #
My take is on my blog: http://writerscyberslate.blogspot.com
Seriously, I am concerned about the existing students at IIPM. They too are being dragged into this controversy and unlike Gaurav will not have any supporters.
Ravikiran
Oct 11th, 2005 at 2:59 pm | #
I have a proposal on my blog. Folks, if you think this is a good idea, please take it up.
kuffir
Oct 11th, 2005 at 3:04 pm | #
just added my bit to iipm’s infrastructure in wikipedia. as i am very bad at adding links, i couldn’t achieve half of what i set out to do. thanks for the lead, ravi kiran.
as i see it, some rights have been violated here but can’t really come up with specifics..we need good legal advice.
i’m with you rashmi, gaurav and the rest.
p.s. wikipedia was a good idea..i’ll go back there tomorrow.
~j~
Oct 11th, 2005 at 3:12 pm | #
is iipm trying to make money by suing bloggers? i’m sure the people reading all the related posts will ensure that nobody from among their family or friends enrolls there. so, this must be a new strategy that they cooked up to cover their expenses.
Varun
Oct 11th, 2005 at 3:13 pm | #
Somebody try and submit this to Slashdot.
I tried but my submission was rejected…
santosh
Oct 11th, 2005 at 4:41 pm | #
The act of IIPM is absolutely dastardly and they need to be taught a lesson. One of the best ways is to hit them where it hurts.
Apparently Dr.Raymond richardson is visiting them shortly. I would request you all to let him know about this incident
His mail id is r.richardson@lse.ac.uk
Bhaskar
Oct 11th, 2005 at 5:17 pm | #
One more drop..
http://sbhaskar.blogspot.com/2005/10/prove-us-wrong-iipm.html
Dr.Vicky
Oct 11th, 2005 at 5:23 pm | #
U guys have my full support.
and i am wondering why IIPM cant be sued back for trying to enroach upon Fundamental Right – Right to free speech and expression of thoughts.
aNTi
Oct 11th, 2005 at 6:19 pm | #
I am in too!
http://superstarksa.blogspot.com/2005/10/free-speech-and-lies-in-advertising.html
Handa
Oct 11th, 2005 at 7:16 pm | #
I think that the media should be informed about all this. I think they are unaware because no one has written about it till now. So, I compiled a list of editors and it would be good if you mailed them too. You can find the list here.
OZ
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:42 pm | #
Posted a third part after reading the shocking news that another blogger has been issued a legal notice by IIPM.
http://desitrain.blogspot.com/2005/10/corporate-mafia.html
OZ
Oct 11th, 2005 at 8:42 pm | #
Posted a third part after reading the shocking news that another blogger has been issued a legal notice by IIPM.
http://desitrain.blogspot.com/2005/10/corporate-mafia.html
Praveen.gk
Oct 11th, 2005 at 9:27 pm | #
Yes posting it in slashdot is a good idea. Just now read abt the issue in sudish’s and lazy’s blog. My full support to Gaurav and im proud that i prevented two of my friends from joining IIPM.
Emma
Oct 11th, 2005 at 11:39 pm | #
I have also linked to you and Gaurav in my post on this topic.
Manpreet
Oct 12th, 2005 at 12:05 am | #
Finally, there is some news in media regarding this issue. Check out today’s issue of Mumbai Mirror. There are excerpts of blog enteries of Gaurav Sabnis and IndianWriting on Page 31 in Blogger’s Park section.
prabhakar
Oct 12th, 2005 at 12:15 am | #
I’m with you guys. V need to teach IIPM a lesson !
Arvind
Oct 12th, 2005 at 12:50 am | #
Today’s Mumbai Mirror has mentioned about this issue in their column ‘What happenning in the worldwide web’.
Pradyot Ghate
Oct 12th, 2005 at 1:31 am | #
Pradyot
Oct 12th, 2005 at 2:32 am | #
Amrit
Oct 12th, 2005 at 3:50 am | #
Here’s another one on the subject:
Taking a stand
Aadisht Khanna
Oct 12th, 2005 at 4:05 am | #
Just bringing this to your notice. IIPM has dropped fake reviews on the Net even before spolgging. This is a year-old Mouthshut review. The author claims to be an IIT-Delhi graduate who dropped IIM Bangalore and joined IIPM.
Interesting points: his name doesn’t show up on the IIT Delhi alumni register, and there is no ‘Kanchenjunga’ hostel in IIT Delhi.
ze rambler
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:14 am | #
Here’s my link guys.
http://ramblingz.blogspot.com/2005/10/blogs-v-iipm.html
Fantastic effort by the blogosphere to rally around the guys who brought this whole issue to public domain. I really feel for the students at IIPM though!
kuffir
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:18 am | #
here’s another post :http://kufr.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-in-wikipedia.html
kuffir
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:26 am | #
here’s another post http://kufr.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-in-wikipedia.html
kuffir
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:27 am | #
here’s another post:
Dreams
Oct 12th, 2005 at 6:03 am | #
I have been following this issue as well, from dubai, and am aghast at what kind of institutions we are trusting to shape our future.. I have also emailed this issue to a coupla newspapers here, will send you the online link if they have them updated..
In the meantime – rooting for gaurav and others..
Dreams
Oct 12th, 2005 at 6:07 am | #
I have been following this issue as well, from dubai, and am aghast at what kind of institutions we are trusting to shape our future.. I have also emailed this issue to a coupla newspapers here, will send you the online link if they have them updated..
In the meantime – rooting for gaurav and others..
http://dreamsnm.rediffblogs.com
Venkat Ramanan
Oct 12th, 2005 at 6:30 am | #
Count me in too! I am all with the blogger community who support Gaurav and JAM. Let us not get bogged down or stoop down to unethical practices followed by the IIPM group (of sending illogical notices, responding on blogs with nasty messages etc). Let us fight for freedom of speech! Let Arindham do his best with his deep pockets, but we bloggers will fight out our best!
Sandeep
Oct 12th, 2005 at 6:53 am | #
Another one from me: http://www.sandeepweb.com/2005/10/12/gimme-a-legal-notice/
J. Angelo Racoma
Oct 12th, 2005 at 7:02 am | #
I posted a link to the story on DIGG.com . Go ahead and DIGG the article so it can have a chance of making the DIGG frontpage and the DIGGnation (weekly) podcast.
Story here
Cheers.
Angelo
http://jangelo.i.ph
http://jangelo.racoma.net
amit
Oct 12th, 2005 at 7:11 am | #
hi
i think that a institute belongs to its students and looking at management education around i think one think that iipm does well is to prevent management from being an elitist profession
on that count it deserves kudos
on others i think i really dont kno
Sarbvir Singh
Oct 12th, 2005 at 7:29 am | #
I think its time Arindam Chaudhri gets fixed once and for all. Apart from all this, he is playing with the future of students who are spending what seem to be amazing amounts for a third rate education.
Arka Mukhopadhyay
Oct 12th, 2005 at 8:10 am | #
Hello,
My name is Arka Mukhopadhyay, and I blog as kaashyapeya at http://kaashyapeya.blospot.com
I have documented my views on this issue on my blog.
Besides, I am one of the founders of the Bangalore bloggers’ community, which operates through the google group blogbang and the collaborative blog everymanscity. I have sent out a request to all members of the Bangalore Bloggers’ Community to join in a proposed protest march to the IIPM, Bangalore campus, to hand over a formal letter of protest to the authorities there. I urge bloggers’ communities in other cities where IIPM has a presence to also consider the same.
Regards,
Arka
~j~
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:12 am | #
Today’s Mumbai Mirror covers the story on Pg. 31. Here’s the online link:
http://www.mumbaimirror.com/nmirror/mmpaper.asp?sectid=14&articleid=10112005239407501011200523933687#
Vishal
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:22 am | #
As promised in my previous post thsi is my reaction and advise to Arindam and IIPM.
Read it here.
Sunil Khaitan
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:27 am | #
Hi,
Really gud to see so many ppl rallying behind Gaurav and others who have been ’sued’….lets take the fight to the IIPM and their chamchas and cteach them a leson they will never forget….let us all mirror Gaurav’s posts and the JAM MAG on all our blogs……lets see how many ppl will they serve with a “legal notice”
Sunil
Madhurima
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:44 am | #
Sandeep, when I look at this whole thing, I feel the pattern is more based on the geographic location of the bloggers. The reason IIPM sent the so called legal notices to Gaurav, Rashmi and Varna may be because they are in India and are easily accessible. I am confident that they haven’t figured out a way yet to sue Indian bloggers abroad. Patrix and Shanti are both is US… and it wouldn’t help IIPM’s cause even is they were served a notice. The harassment by IIPM can be continued at varied fronts in India.
Gaurav, Rashmi and Varna… All support to you…
gawker
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:45 am | #
IIPM fine print division served legal notice by IIPM large print division
apu
Oct 12th, 2005 at 10:03 am | #
Although Gaurav is clear that IBM did not ask him to resign, I still wish, they had asked him to stay back, and called IIPM’s bluff. This is actually going to give them more negative publicity..
apu
Oct 12th, 2005 at 10:07 am | #
Have linked to my blog as well. Although Gaurav is clear that IBM did not ask him to resign, I still wish, they had asked him to stay back, and called IIPM’s bluff. This is actually going to give them more negative publicity..
Vulturo
Oct 12th, 2005 at 10:35 am | #
Gawker, you are one helluva Genius
gawker
Oct 12th, 2005 at 10:45 am | #
heh thanks Vulturo .. This cows got a lot of milk in her.
Sriram
Oct 12th, 2005 at 11:52 am | #
I know there might be enough folks who’ve already said this, but still… World class campuses my ass… I’ve seen the chennai campus.. since when is a single three or four storey building called a “world-class” campus? Probably qualifies as a “world-ass” building. More coming up on my blog later.
Varun
Oct 12th, 2005 at 12:08 pm | #
This gentleman has even included the IIPM tag in his post so then people end up there…
http://catciao.blogspot.com/2005/10/top-5-crazies-among-us.html
The IIPM tags (as well as all the other top tags) are in black font on the black background so you wont be able to see them. Hit Ctrl+A to see them…
The Desi Nole
Oct 12th, 2005 at 12:21 pm | #
Will the mainstream Indan media pick up this article and credit the bloggers. This is the part of the issue I am concentrating on. So far there have been two papers who have picked up the article, discussing things around the issue like legality, but not the issue itself. Lets wait and see, in the meanwhile, I am going to keep updating my post with any new information from the media.
Varna
Oct 12th, 2005 at 12:45 pm | #
Just to let you know my take on my legal notice:
http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-afterthoughts.html
Varun
Oct 12th, 2005 at 1:37 pm | #
Tag metasearch for IIPM is also quite interesting
http://iipm.gada.be/b
(Via http://nullbit.wordpress.com/2005/10/12/the-power-of-blogs/)
venk@
Oct 12th, 2005 at 2:25 pm | #
DP,
I live in Brussels and noticed that IIPM have “contacts” right here in town. Trying to reach em, but no answer. Kill keep u posted.
Rajesh J Advani
Oct 12th, 2005 at 2:57 pm | #
I was pretty sure I wasn’t Chinese. Now I’m beginning to have doubts.
Does anyone see the need for Gaurav and Varna to get anticipatory bail? Or am I being paranoid and playing into the hands of the enemy?
lakshmi
Oct 12th, 2005 at 3:01 pm | #
Please add http://www.lakshmir.blogspot.com
Madhurima
Oct 12th, 2005 at 3:14 pm | #
Rajesh,
The e-mail that they have sent as a legal notice is crap…Based on that e-mail I don’t think they need to get any bails yet.
My opinion! If there are any lawyers opinion,that would be helpful…
J. Angelo Racoma
Oct 12th, 2005 at 3:20 pm | #
I posted a link on DIGG.com. Let’s all DIGG (vote for) the story so it will be pushed up to the front page of DIGG news, and possibly be discussed in the weekly DIGGnation podcast.
Link here:
http://digg.com/technology/IBM_(India)_employee_resigns_over_blog_posts
Angelo
http://jangelo.racoma.net
Surya
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:15 pm | #
Where do we go from here with the fight against IIPM!
Did IIPM Win?
http://desaraju.blogspot.com
Prasann
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:15 pm | #
I have just gone through a lot of blogs and posts regarding the IIPM issue. I will be writing about the issue on my blog. Just want to say that i support Gaurav and Rashmi.
Twilight Fairy
Oct 12th, 2005 at 5:56 pm | #
oh boy! looks like I am totally clueless abt this due to my Paris trip.. just tuning in now..
Kasthuri Srinivasan
Oct 12th, 2005 at 6:31 pm | #
Here is my URL in which I have written about the mis-management in IIPM.
http://kasthurisrinivasan.blogspot.com/2005/10/mis-management.html
Rajesh J Advani
Oct 12th, 2005 at 6:54 pm | #
Madhurima,
I guess I was thinking of getting anticipatory bail before any arrest warrants are actually filed. Legally speaking IIPM doesn’t even have a toe to stand on, but you never know what underhanded tactics they might surprise us with. Just in case bribes are passed around, I don’t think any of us would like to see our fellow bloggers spend even a minute in a police station.
Rajesh J Advani
Oct 12th, 2005 at 7:27 pm | #
An article on Mumbai Newsline –
Bloggers join hands against B-school
Pankaj Gupta
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:04 pm | #
Sending on behalf of Rajesh J Advani:
Comment # 192
Rajesh J Advani said,
October 12, 2005 at 7:27 pm
Indian Express
An article on Mumbai Newsline -
Bloggers join hands against B-school
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=152721
kamesh
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:06 pm | #
In an yet an other blow to the IIPM, a major english language daily “Indian Express” has written an article on the IIPM issue titled “Bloggers join hands against B-school“.
kamesh
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:11 pm | #
Inn an yet an other blow to the IIPM, a major english language daily “Indian Express” has written an article on the IIPM issue titled “Bloggers join hands against B-school“.
Pankaj Gupta
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:16 pm | #
This is cool,
More dirt from Indian Express, August 17,
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=144202
Read the comment of IIPM Crony. Lol.
Suhail Kazi
Oct 12th, 2005 at 9:55 pm | #
I am disappointed. It’s a half-baked article. Doesn’t even mention Rashmi or JAM, the main article which Gaurav linked to. Looks like someone did a quick job. But hey, something is better than nothing. I hope some other MSM stands up and does a start-to-finish job on this.
ananth
Oct 12th, 2005 at 10:05 pm | #
Why not google boomb these guys. let the blogging community collectively bomb IIPM and the Arindham guy
Rk
Oct 12th, 2005 at 11:35 pm | #
My support and best wishes to Rashmi Gaurav and others involved. http://rk.negimaki.com/blog/index.php/2005/10/13/power-of-bloggers/
Sunny
Oct 13th, 2005 at 12:20 am | #
British Indian blogs also representing!
http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/82
Kanishk
Oct 13th, 2005 at 12:58 am | #
I am with Rashmi and Gaurav Sabnis. I have written in my blog based in US and I am trying my level best to make everyone I know read it and write in support of Rashmi Bansal & Gaurav Sabnis.
We are all together against this rogue institue.
Anantha
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:05 am | #
A legal eagle tells me that IIPM could be on a sticky wicket if they go to the courts. The reason being, the court will first of all question the right of IIPM to use the words INDIAN INSTITUTE in their name. It seems, it’s illegal to use words like INDIAN OR NATIONAL unless you are a government institution. I believe a few insititutes were hauled up by the courts, recently, for pasting these prefixes to their names. Hope that offers hope to the legally harassed.
Vikramaditya
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:15 am | #
I am in full agreement with Gaurav & the others who speak out against IIPM. I have one yardstick that I use to measure the general quality of any B-school. My experience tells me that the better thw quality of an institution gets, the lesser publicity it will require to attract students. To quote a few examples, all the Ivy league institutes issue just a single admission notification each, but they manage to get the cream of the MBA aspirant pools while on the other hand, we have places like IIPm & it’s ilk who spend crores of rupees on publicity & still achieve nothing out ou it.
Tushar Joshi
Oct 13th, 2005 at 2:46 am | #
Hello, I support Gaurav Sabnis, Rashmi and all the blogger community in this issue.
http://tusharvjoshi.blogspot.com/2005/10/freedom-of-speech.html
Regards, Tushar
Navin
Oct 13th, 2005 at 3:23 am | #
I am New to blogworld…support your cause…will try to post something on it in my blog.
DontheCat
Oct 13th, 2005 at 3:26 am | #
While I strongly support Gaurav on his post on the Institute, I find it ridiculous that he chose to quit IBM. That’s as immature as those dudes threatening to burn their laptops.
So what is he going to do next? If he joins MicroSoft and the students threaten to burn all their PCs running Windows, wil he quit MS too?
His act has actually taken the wind out of the sails.
Rajesh J Advani
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:13 am | #
My take -
Based On A True Story
Megha
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:16 am | #
Posted about this issue at – Are you being served? May the force be with Gaurav and Rashmi.
mandar
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:38 am | #
A lawyer friend of mine who looked at the legal notices sent by IIPM found them hilarious and ful of legal holes.
More importantly he has offered to help bloggers with legal advice or clarifications if needed.
My update on this here: IIPM – Blog Wars: An Offer of Legal Advice
~j~
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:53 am | #
Here’s my post on the issue:
http://jpostcards.blogspot.com/2005/10/postcard-from-j-blog-sweat-and-tears.html
~j~
Mridula
Oct 13th, 2005 at 5:33 am | #
I wrote about what do you find if you search IIPM on Google and Yahoo! I am surprised that I like Yahoo! results more.
Satish Vijaykumar
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:02 am | #
I’ve done my by bit at my blog http://www.bombaylives.blogspot.com
cheers
satish
Bem
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:07 am | #
My opinion is here! http://liklasa.blogspot.com/2005/10/my-very-precious-opinion.html
Kiran Kumar Chava
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:09 am | #
http://chavakiran.blogspot.com/2005/10/blog-post_13.html
invincible
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:24 am | #
I strongly rebut the disgusting and despicable techniques used by IIPM against an academic scholar and the journalist. They r trying to manipulate against the public voice. What management lesson is this !!
Hats off to you Gaurav.
Instead of doing research/typing long pages/asking for more agitation, why not ask for a formal permission to visit IIPM facilities, by some neutral but authoritative observers. Those supporting IIPM should lend their hand to help, as it would also prove their sincere desire to let people get the ‘facts’ about their beloved institute.
Let the observers verify the truth behind the tall comments and state of the art infrastructure. Let them verify the records of the lectures by profs from Yale n Harvard. We all can trust their views and that wd also put all the doubts to rest.
Let the truth prevail ..
invincible
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:26 am | #
I strongly rebut the disgusting and despicable techniques used by IIPM against an academic scholar and the journalist. They r trying to manipulate against the public voice. What management lesson is this !!
Hats off to you Gaurav.
Instead of doing research/typing long pages/asking for more agitation, why not ask for a formal permission to visit IIPM facilities, by some neutral but authoritative observers. Those supporting IIPM should lend their hand to help, as it would also prove their sincere desire to let people get the ‘facts’ about their beloved institute.
Let the observers verify the truth behind the tall comments and state of the art infrastructure. Let them verify the records of the lectures by profs from Yale n Harvard. We all can trust their views and that wd also put all the doubts to rest.
Let the truth prevail ..
http://thatsinvincible.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-jamed.html
Kaps
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:33 am | #
NDTV will be covering the IIPM fracas tonight.
http://www.desipundit.com/2005/10/13/ndtv-to-cover-iipm-fracas-tonight/
Kiran Kumar Chava
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:42 am | #
http://chavakiran.blogspot.com/2005/10/blog-post_13.html
Here goes my post.
puneetworld
Oct 13th, 2005 at 6:48 am | #
my take on this
Was it opinions or allegations why is iipm suing indian blogger ?
http://puneetworld.indiablogs.org/archives/2005/10/opinions_vs_all.html
a summary inshort point i have covered
-Freedom of speech Allegations VS opinions
-did gaurav make allegations or expressed his opinions ?
-Its morally unethical amateurish to sue someone for their opinion
-Are indian cyber laws redundant ?
-freedom of speech support badge few designed by me
and also not to mentioned “getting sued is not in my priority list thus a little disclaimer below in my postif at all its needed or not time would tell ”
lol
Suderman
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:03 am | #
Hi,
I had emailed legal expert Naavi to find out how valid these electronic legal notices are.
He says:
“though notices in e-form are legally recognizable, legal notices prior to launch of court proceedings may require to follow established court procedures. I suppose that if the defence refuses to acknowledge the notice, Court when approached may direct the petitioner to serve another proper notice through paper”.
The entire mail is available on my blog for those who want to know more.
But what that quote above tells me is that if you’ve got an electronic legal notice, you can simply trash it and not acknowlege receipt.
The court will ask them to send one on paper. Let them send one on paper if they are serious. And how do they find your postal address?? Google wont give them, they are bound by contract not to…
Ash
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:05 am | #
The whole fiasco behind the IIPM threats have totally grossed me out. I have joined in the fight. I would have liked to jot down some of MY OWN views on this, but i feel terrible about jotting this down in such a rush. I really havent done it any justice at all. But, still i have passed the word around.. and will update more briefly later sometime. For now, i have it up on my blog. Thanks. You guys r really doing an amazingly great job. much much much appreciated!!
Suderman
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:14 am | #
With IIPM officials denying any knowledge of these notices, I am more than convinced that these notices are a hoax.
Shriniwas Kulkarni
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:19 am | #
We are rallying behind Gaurav and Rashmi in this matter. Gaurav is our good friend, through the Mumbai and Pune quizzing circles. After all, there is always something called “proper channel” and IIPM should have abided by the rules of law in response to any publication; it should have clarified its position first. Now I am thinking that the numerous engineering and medical colleges that are run by politicians are much better than these self styled private institutions in cases of college administration and abiding by guidelines set by premium Indian educational agencies like Medical Council of India (MCI), The ILS and All India Council of Technical Eduaction (AICTE). The unprofessional attitude of IIPM is highly condemnable.
Sumeet Singh
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:19 am | #
Here is my contribution to the fight. Let truth prevail.
http://sumeetsingh.net/blog/?p=31
- Sumeet
Shriniwas K
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:20 am | #
We are rallying behind Gaurav and Rashmi in this matter. Gaurav is our good friend, through the Mumbai and Pune quizzing circles. After all, there is always something called “proper channel” and IIPM should have abided by the rules of law in response to any publication; it should have clarified its position first. Now I am thinking that the numerous engineering and medical colleges that are run by politicians are much better than these self styled private institutions in cases of college administration and abiding by guidelines set by premium Indian educational agencies like Medical Council of India (MCI), The ILS and All India Council of Technical Eduaction (AICTE). The unprofessional attitude of IIPM is highly condemnable.
Vishnupriya
Oct 13th, 2005 at 8:20 am | #
Here’s my half a cent worth.
http://vishkanya.blogspot.com/2005/10/blog-wars.html
also, from some of my friends.
Samit Basu
http://samitbasu.blogspot.com/2005/10/still-blinking-in-disbelief.html
Vishnupriya Sharma
http://sleepyface.blogspot.com/2005/10/blogger-and-scam.html
Laura
http://roadsanddays.blogspot.com/2005/10/with-you-rashmi.html
Prithviraj
http://mediaperspectives.blogspot.com/2005/10/is-india-free.html
Hemangini
http://hemanginigupta.blogspot.com/2005/10/gaurav-sabnis-story.html
invincible
Oct 13th, 2005 at 8:57 am | #
so NDTV is doing the role of the arbitrator. Good to see that. But it’s evident from the non-coperation of IIPM, that they are in much shallow water than they claim and also no official statement giving the facts has come out yet from them.
I hope their disgusting acts and fraudulent claims meet the treatment they deserve !
(sad to know that today’s media coverage is postponed
)
Varun
Oct 13th, 2005 at 9:07 am | #
2 things:
[1] At what exact time does the program come on TV?
[2] Can we host a recording on the Net? Wont we have to take permission from NDTV first? We dont want to get into a legal tangle ourselves, do we?
And the program wont air tonight
http://alaphia.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-vs-bloggers.html
And I tried to comment on the post that announced the NDTV coverage but was unable to do so inspite of trying 6-7 times. Any tech problem at your end?
Varun
Oct 13th, 2005 at 9:18 am | #
Maybe I am being paranoid but I just hope that the postponement is actually that and that NDTV has not shelved the program…
Kaps
Oct 13th, 2005 at 9:36 am | #
Varun,
I have removed the NDTV post as the program has been postponed.
Thejesh
Oct 13th, 2005 at 9:37 am | #
Here is my view on it http://www.techmag.biz/Indian_blogger_vs_IIPM_whats_up
SUMIT
Oct 13th, 2005 at 9:52 am | #
hey
Gaurav we are all with you…………..
Sandeep Ramesh
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:15 am | #
The legality of the whole issue. Can we now sue the new bloggers for defamation of Rashmi’s character????
Zarkov
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:18 am | #
Why not submit this to Slashdot? I’m sue they’ll want to run this story as well…
Mehul
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:33 am | #
My support here:
http://jatsdoit.blogspot.com/2005/10/i-want-legal-notice-too.html
Hope I get a legal notice too!!
Mukundan
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:36 am | #
Yeah, useless colleges need to be chucked out, atlest the future guys will have a better life
Grand Master
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:55 am | #
Support Rashmi and Gaurav fully. Aghast at the deliberate vilification.
To set record straight, wish to say A. Sandeep, Dean of IIPM was the one who was debarred from IIM, Calcutta for unethical practices and nefarious activities. If in doubt, go and ask any 1996 or 1997 IIMC pass out on his dubious reputation.
Varna
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:57 am | #
Hi! An update: I spoke to express last night and they seem to have published a story. Have done a on-camera interview with NDTV today, it should be aired on Mumbai Live at around 10:00 p,m. Be sure to watch!
Varun
Oct 13th, 2005 at 10:58 am | #
NDTV program is back on!
Upen
Oct 13th, 2005 at 12:04 pm | #
Is anyone actually intending to sue IIPM for false advertisements? This should be the easiest way out to shut their tall claims and close them forever.
Wish I could watch the NDTV release, unfortuantely not in USA.
Good going Varna, DeisPundit and Gaurav.
Suggest we all unite and set up a blog dedicated solely to end such unethical practices and illegal activities going on in India. This one single blog should be the forum to help address all such issues and can be linked through all other blogs. That way we can all do our bit for our country. But with so many millions of blogs, we might be lost. Let us have one blog dedicated to such matters.
Let me know what you guys think.
gawker
Oct 13th, 2005 at 12:07 pm | #
Something fishy this way cometh
Pankaj Gupta
Oct 13th, 2005 at 12:16 pm | #
Here it is on NDTV:
http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmorestory.asp?category=National&slug=Row+over+IIPM+blogs&id=79968
MumbaiGirl
Oct 13th, 2005 at 12:23 pm | #
Have blogged about this and how, if they’re willing to burn their own laptops while claiming to be an educational establishment, should burn all other signs of being a school as well.
Gajendra Saini
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:01 pm | #
Dear People
Good Evening!
Why are we doing all this? Aren’t we all esclating and instigating this issue to a greater controversy?
What is the need of doing such ridicilous acts?
As, an alumni of the same Busines School ( Batch 1995-98) I admit to the fact that IIPM has been one of the best B schools in India and I have got substantial facts with me to take a strong stance. It’s being 7 and half years I have been working in various sectors at different capacities. What all that has been expressed here is the common unbelief based on the personal frustrating experiences of some of those who did not get placed in any organization or might have had some other reason to get indulged in such dirty piece of act.
Do we know what are we doing? Who are we targeting? How does it effect the image of those who have boasted upon various achivements in their professional careers and owe it compeletly to their learning platforms.
Well, it’s quite easy to raise fingers and dubious views about any institution advocating the fact that it is for a COMMON CAUSE.
I hereby condemn and feel sad for such incidents. It shows the extreme level of incompetency in us at such an age. We all are competent and confident enough to see what’s wrong and right at our surroundings. This Business School ( IIPM) has been in existence since 1973 and has produced top class performers holding various assignments in good blue chip orgaizations. I never as a matter of fact felt deprived of the fact that I am an alumni of the same business school. I am quite contented to see that I have been able to deliver quite well in life because of a strong platform and high value added learnings at IIPM.If you feel and getting into the quest of carrying out these ridiculous comparisions then do take some extra pain of finding some more facts about what students learn at IIPM.
People feel ashamed of the fact that it is quite easy to get into this institute and henceforth everything comes with an easy virtue…… I feel pity for such people who simply find their ways out to express their frustration in mapping their INCOMPETENCIES. We all are aware of the stringent procedures of getting in any of the IIM’s and other Management institutions. I have personally carried out a research sometime back to see the admissions process in these institutions. You will be stunned to notice that none of these educational institutions have a clear transparent procedure of imparting admissions to students. Here are some of the questions that need to be addressed:
All the IIM’s put together will not have more than 626 seats this year. Does that mean only 626 people have the right to be acclaimed and tagged as IIM’s alumni and get off a to a high start in their careers. Are we not confining the quality of education to some handful of people in the society and then talk about big reforms and knowldege transformation in the country based on their skills and knowledge? Does our contry need only 600 Management graduates every year. GIVE ME A BREAK……
Secondly, the quality of education at IIPM is at par with any of the edicational institutions not only in India but anywehere around the world. I have attended quite a few Management Development and Executive Development Programs held at various universities in India. Trust, me the amount of knowledge and skills that an alumni of this institute possesses is the same what people carry from different educational institutions?
Why there is a hue and cry when you see yourself at the same stage, enjoy the same status in the society and work among those who hail from various other segments from the society?
This entire exercise of dragging and swamping the image of an institution which has done radically well for the masses is quite sad and holds us responsible to the DAMAGE CONTROL EXERCISE. If we think, that anyone is malicious and operate with wrong intentions, then we must find out the reasons. Let’s not bombard and preach to any such conclusions.
Let’s all work in tandem and encourage the youth of India to add glory to this country. No educational institution is bad or good. Had this institute not been good or worthwile, it would have been a history. It is not a fly by night operator. It may not give you good breakthroughs at the intital stage but the value addition you get by studying here is really admiring. You probably might not realise it now but would feel it after sometime in your careers.
Issuance of a laptop or petty issues like tour of overseas hold no logic and worthless to be addressed. Therefore, please let’s not waste our time in tarnishing the image of any such institution rather if you feel that something needs to improved, then do exercise your democratic powers of bringing changes in a constructive manner.
Let’s talk and analyze the contributions of everyone out here.
I am sure that you will not feel bad about it.
I am quite sure that we all are competent enough to build our careers and lives on our own. Even for an instance if someone did not get the right opportunity somewhere,must not loose hopes.
Work hard to prove your ability, courage and determination towards goals in life.
All of you can reach me incase you need assistance. I feel that I might help you people out in removing your doubts and sweep the smoke screens.
Hope it puts an end to this controversy out here.
Cheers!
Regards
Gajendra Saini
Lazy Geek
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:07 pm | #
By calling the whole thing a hoax we are in-directly bullying Gaurav. I think we got to wait and see before to any conclusions on this whole issue.
Mridula
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:08 pm | #
Varun I was glued to the set from 8.00 to 10.00 at night but there was nothing. At least I did not see anything.
arZan
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:30 pm | #
Mr. Saini
How does one reach you ? You did not leave an email inside the post.
Also, you are completely off target about what the real issue is. The issue at hand is the bullying of the institute when its fraudulant advertising claims were exposed to the public. That is the issue at hand and not one of competence of the alumni etc.
I would love to tear apart your rant, point by point, but other commenters above have covered it in greater detail. Please read through it.
As far as IIPM being a “top” business school, even that is not true. Let alone top, it does not even have the basic accreditation required of such a learning institution.
Frankly it looks like a fly by night school, which has since 1973 flown under the radar. But when it tried to take off and get into the big league, it so loudly proclaims to be, people started asking question. And the rest is history…and evolving at that.
Other egalitarian statements you make contribute nothing to the issue at hand.
Work hard to prove your ability, courage and determination towards goals in life.
While this sounds very good, it is so generic that it could be applied to any profession and in any walk of life.
arZan
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:35 pm | #
Here is more on IIPM and the Belgium Connection….
prakash
Oct 13th, 2005 at 1:41 pm | #
just FYI, ‘Mumbai Live” @10.30 PM tonight didnt carry any story on this issue.
oz
Oct 13th, 2005 at 2:15 pm | #
I am thinking of joining IIPM.
lakshmi
Oct 13th, 2005 at 2:41 pm | #
How about creating a fund for the legal expenses of these people? May be what I am saying is not a good idea. It is just a suggestion.
Varna
Oct 13th, 2005 at 2:49 pm | #
Hello! Just an update. I think Mumbai Live intends to carry the story tomorrow. In the meantime I intend to stop posting about IIPm. Here’s why: http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/last-post-on-iipm.html
Seshu
Oct 13th, 2005 at 2:50 pm | #
Here is my 2 paisas worth –
http://www.tiffinbox.org/2005/10/bloggergate.html
Deepthi
Oct 13th, 2005 at 2:59 pm | #
I support Gaurav, Rashmi and Varna whole-heartedly.
http://deardeepthi.blogspot.com/2005/10/what-you-shouldnt-blog.html
As I say in my post above, I sort of pity the poor students studying in the pitiful institute. I mean, it really shows how worried they are if they are willing to burn the one and only laptop given to them by the institute :-p
Suderman
Oct 13th, 2005 at 3:36 pm | #
Hello,
In this information overload, looks like people, especially those compiling it, are just skimming thru posts.
So let me just clarify, I said the electronic legal notices are a hoax as in they have very little legal standing. at best, these mails from IIPM are plain threats. They are from IIPM, they do communicate intent to sue but IN NO WAY CAN THESE NOTICES BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY UNTIL THE DEFENCE GETS SUCH COMMUNICATION ON PAPER AT HIS OR HER POSTAL ADDRESS.
Cuz, as the legal expert says, u can only send email notices after proceedings in court have started.
These email notices are not yet serious or real, IIPM just wanted to threaten the bloggers believe so. If they were serious, they wud be talking to the media and announcing intent to sue. The only official quote we’ve got till date is: “I don’t think so.” from All-India Dean of IIPM.
So obviously, they say it in public domain on paper, it does not hold water. Tomorrow, you can always tell the court u deleted a stupid mail asking u for 200 crores thinking it was spam or a bad joke!
Again, just a reminder, if you get one of these jokes asking for 175 crores or such pocket change, dont bother replying (cuz even if they are real, u get into trouble only by replying or acknowledging receipt) or telling the world u’ve got it. Let them send u a notice on paper, till then its only laugh-worthy.
The electronic legal notice is just another IIPM tall claim. Read it again, the notice ends by saying:
“Your formal response shall be expected by the 12 noon (Indian Standard Time) of 6th October 2005 ; failing which, we shall proceed with the parallel arrest proceedings against you.”
Arrest proceedings??? Duh, they are not the police. They cannot proceed to arrest you! Any real lawyer knows this. Obviously its one of those incompetent IIPM staff at work!!
There’s more…
“Refrain in the future from releasing any news item containing IIPM’s reference without the prior explicit written approval of IIPM.”
Any real lawyer knows that information in public domain can be shared by anyone with anyone unless its copyright protected by IIPM. And even suggesting taht you can’t release it reeks of stupidity.
You guys still want to believe its a real authentic legal notice??? I give up.
Patrix
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:08 pm | #
Suderman,
Of course the amount of information out there is crushing. But with what I mean when I say that this isn’t a hoax because Gaurav did resign from IBM due to some credible threats. The email notice IIPM sent might not have legal standing but their threat against speaking out freely still stands.
Sid
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:26 pm | #
More fraud?
Interesting….
Sriram
Oct 13th, 2005 at 4:53 pm | #
Patrix,
Have had some free time and spent it digging some details about the people listed in the “alliances” section of the IIPM page. Results are posted in my post. feel free to include them if you think they are worth the effort.
Ashutosh
Oct 13th, 2005 at 5:25 pm | #
My take on the IIPM issue, blogging, and possible democratization of the media.
http://ashujo.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-blogging-and-democratization-of.html
Thanks
Ashutosh
Sib.
Oct 13th, 2005 at 5:25 pm | #
I have added a post about this entire controversy on my blog at:
http://sibin.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-emi-ebms-isi-fbi-cbi-abc.html
Twilight Fairy
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:35 pm | #
ok, here’s my bit – One tight slap
Two Penny
Oct 13th, 2005 at 7:43 pm | #
I am an ex blogger. Have been away for a long time. But the crap that is being dished out might prompt me to make a comeback. Looks like this army could use another fighter.
May the force be with you all…
Keep up the good fight.
Penny
Achan Deep Singh
Oct 13th, 2005 at 8:00 pm | #
I am all for Gaurav and Rashmi. I have read Rashmi’s Articles on B-schools before, during the time i was preparing for CAT and other b school entrances.
What Gaurav has done is truly inspiring. I look up to him as a hero, though i cant say if i could have done the same if i was in his shoes, but now he has set an example for us to follow and has practiced what we bloggers seem to preach all the time.
When we talk about freedom of speech, we mean it.
Hariharan
Oct 13th, 2005 at 8:05 pm | #
My support to him.
Satish Talim
Oct 13th, 2005 at 8:56 pm | #
Gaurav, we are all there with you.
Sriram
Oct 13th, 2005 at 9:30 pm | #
I think this ‘legal notice’ story is too true to believe. According to me, this is just someone playing a prank on these bloggers. It’s similar to one of those mails I got couple of days ago from Prince Wajallah, eldest son of Queen Latifah of Burundi asking for a financial aid. This guy even sent his Bujumbura’s address
Moral of the story–> Some idotic fool who had nothing else to do on this planet, sat down on a computer, guised himself as the prince in the mail and thus became a father of the spam mail in this particular instance..
I thought Indians had freedom of speech. I sure can believe to some extent of a legal notice being served to a magazine (for what ever reasons), and I have seen some instances in past of magazine editors getting sued..
But this is absolutely ridiculous… Now that I have said that this IIPM thing or whatever is junk, are they run behind me sending me some kinda silly notices (analogous to the prince or burundi story) ?? My left foot !!!
I have given my email in this story. Let that fellow send a mail to me,as a dutiful american citizen, I will sue him,his family, his company for gazillions of $$ for causing me lots of mental agony and he and his generations to come will have to keep putting money in their piggy banks to repay my money…
Sahil
Oct 13th, 2005 at 11:43 pm | #
Check it out.
The Man
Oct 13th, 2005 at 11:59 pm | #
In case people want to do more research on the web of deceit that surrounds IIPM – here goes. Gawker and others researched the institutions affiliated with IIPM – namely Barcelona Business School (BBS) etc. I thought I should take it a step further. BBS says its programs are validated by the “Global Council for Management Education” (reference: link at the bottom of the following page – http://www.bbs-edu.org/aboutus.htm )
So people, go ahead, visit the site for the Global Council for Management Education (GCME) and see what they are all about. Here is the link – http://www.gcme.org/index.htm
Its a half-assed site with little to no content, very little information and no ownership. Also it is incorporated in Nevada. I did a quick search on the Nevada Secretary of State site and here is the search results page: https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=401841
Now why would Global Council with 1 person as the President, Secretary and Treasurer who incidentally resides in Belgium want to incorporate in Nevada of all places? Could it be because in Nevada you can get incorporated in 48 hours that too online?
Hmmm…something is rotten in Belgium.
Can someone do a whois lookup on all these parties and post the results?
The Man
Oct 14th, 2005 at 12:02 am | #
Hmmm.. In case people want to do more research on the web of deceit that surrounds IIPM – here goes. Gawker and others researched the institutions affiliated with IIPM – namely Barcelona Business School (BBS) etc. I thought I should take it a step further. BBS says its programs are validated by the “Global Council for Management Education” (reference: link at the bottom of the following page – http://www.bbs-edu.org/aboutus.htm )
So people, go ahead, visit the site for the Global Council for Management Education (GCME) and see what they are all about. Here is the link – http://www.gcme.org/index.htm
Its a half-assed site with little to no content, very little information and no ownership. Also it is incorporated in Nevada. I did a quick search on the Nevada Secretary of State site and here is the search results page: https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=401841
Now why would Global Council with 1 person as the President, Secretary and Treasurer who incidentally resides in Belgium want to incorporate in Nevada of all places? Could it be because in Nevada you can get incorporated in 48 hours that too online?
Hmmm…something is rotten in Belgium.
Can someone do a whois lookup on all these parties and post the results?
Avinash Subramaniam
Oct 14th, 2005 at 12:07 am | #
http://ifaqs.blogspot.com/2005/10/its-not-iipms-fault.html
My noise to the noise.
Divya
Oct 14th, 2005 at 12:42 am | #
If IIPM had half as much as class as they claim to have … they’d have handled this better.
And as for that article on student burning their certificates .. I guess they just realised its really not worth a shit outside of IIPM campus.
Anyways .. this is a classic case of how freedom of speech gets opressed in this country. Very sad that an educational institution is setting such a bad example. They have done more damange to their reputation than they claim Saurav has. This is not how an institution should behave.
Oops.. have I said too much? Am I going to get sued too?
Mike
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:00 am | #
Yeah! An alum of IIML, Mr. Sabnis, you’ve done us proud….and also, in a way made a few of us ashamed at thinking of what we may have done in your situation. The hat is doffed to you and adoration and respect felt for you is something that words can’t express…..Cheers! And yes, count me in among those that lend a hand to this fight….the least I could do…
midnightmare.blogspot.com/2005/10/arin-be-damned.html
The Man
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:23 am | #
Well, something new here (sort of – article is from 2003):
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/mp/2003/10/23/stories/2003102300890400.htm
*deleted* (Please no personal attacks or ad hominem arguments! – DesiPundit)
BTW, he plans to enter into politics. I get the feeling it will be the Congress Party that will benefit from Dr AC’s infinite guru-dom….maybe it is the special mention of Ms. Gandhi towards the end of the article, or maybe I am just prescient.
The Man
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:32 am | #
I strongly believe that this is a cry for help from the inner child within our resident devil (Arindam Chaddu for the uninitiated)
His movie, titled “Rok Sako To Rok Lo” (Stop me if you can) screams out to the audience and to the people reading this blog that he really wants to be stopped. Now, will anyone oblige the poor chap?
BTW, see this link for the movie review
http://in.rediff.com/movies/2004/dec/10rok.htm
prabukarthik
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:35 am | #
I am with Gaurav and Rashmi. IIPM has dig its own grave
Kaps
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:36 am | #
The Man,
Thanks for the article. In October 2003 they planned to open branches in many destinations overseas -
“On the same lines as his management institutes in India, Arindam will shortly launch business schools in London, Geneva, Washington DC, Beijing and Singapore, offering a business philosophy where
EQ is often more important than IQ.”
Patrix
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:39 am | #
The Man,
Please no personal attacks or ad hominem arguments! I am deleting your comment pertaining to facts not relating to this issue.
Nirav
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:40 am | #
Hi… this is my second post on this story… it is a satirical version of why it is so important for us to win this battle:
http://mehtanirav.blogspot.com/2005/10/why-victory-is-important.html
The Man
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:57 am | #
Thanks for pointing that out Patrix.
So, while everyone is still hot on the topic of free speech etc, has anyone made a renewed effort to contact IIPM for their comments on the original JAM magazine article?
Given the level of noise, they may want to use the opportunity to refute the JAM mag claims!! If at all.
sathish
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:57 am | #
What Gaurav was doing was just quoting the article in Jammag. I dont think IIPM should pick up individuals and react so badly threatening to burn up the laptops, which sounds absurd.
IIPM might not be bad after all as quoted but they should have tried to prove people wrong instead of filing defamation suit. IIPM should have tried other means and not given a publicity to Gaurav nor earning a negative publicity for themselves.
Gaurav has turned out to be an overnight hero by even resigning from his job.
Looking out for more updates on this issue.
Aditya
Oct 14th, 2005 at 2:06 am | #
My two bits here:
http://sillysod.blogspot.com/2005/10/you-have-probably-heard-about.html
With you all the way.
Ravishankar Shrivastava
Oct 14th, 2005 at 2:10 am | #
Just Another View!
Deepanjan Nag
Oct 14th, 2005 at 2:30 am | #
IIPM’s tall & lofty claims in its larger-than-life ads. are a farce and anyone but the most thickheaded can see thru its schemes.
On second thoughts, maybe IIPM can indeed teach the IIM’s a thing or two about management. After all, it did help spectacularly launch the career of a mediocre student (Arindam Choudhry) with flawless precision! That’s HR management at its best! I hope they are equally adept at crisis management!
Mila
Oct 14th, 2005 at 2:38 am | #
Hi Gaurav,
I really feel proud of you! What you’ve done is really commendable – very rarely such a young mind can take such a significant moral stance against the filthy tricks of IIPM.
I’m really sorry that you had to loose your much deserved job at IBM. But let me tell you, if you’ve made it to IBM you’d make it to another place of equal repute in no time, so please don’t get disheartened…the facts about IIPM is spreading far and wide as I speak.
I leave outside of India. My brother goes to IIPM. We all have fallen victim to the fraudulent practices of IIPM.
The place simply sucks; it induldges in horrendously fraudulent/manipulative tactics to rip every student off – its every action is telltale of that. It’s excruciatingly painful to see how thousands of students year in and year out fall prey to their preposterous claims.
So my piece of advise is to all the potential MBA seekers – pleaaaaaase.. dont waste yours and/or your near/dear one’s hard-earned money which would eventually end up in con artist, Arindam Chaudhuri’s bank balance or in the day to today running of his or his cohort’s lavish life style.
Best regards and good luck,
Mila
Please feel free to pass/post my mail to every one around to warn the potential MBA seekers at IIPM.
Ravikumar
Oct 14th, 2005 at 3:47 am | #
There seems to be an interesting comment left by a lawyer blogger Vasu in Chakra’s blog on this issue.
http://www.chakkarapani.com/graffiti/?p=122
Indianf1fan
Oct 14th, 2005 at 4:16 am | #
Dear friends,
Was really shocked at eh turn of events happening vis a vis IIPM and Guarav.
No PR guy worth his money would have retorted the way IIPM did and the way it is geting snowballed is simply because of its attitude.
I did have a little respect for Arindham but now I have decided to reconsider that.
Gaurav we are all with you. Lets see what happens and let them know just ads cant make better Management institutes.
Govar
Oct 14th, 2005 at 4:36 am | #
Addded one more post on why its important for those ‘good’ IIPM students to force mgmt. to release damange control statements.
Ameya
Oct 14th, 2005 at 5:12 am | #
so its way past the deadline that IIPM’s “legal notice” had warned varna of..
just proves the cotton balls they have..
Shreyas
Oct 14th, 2005 at 5:18 am | #
my second post on this matter.. legal gaggles by IIPM..
some insight on the validity and repurcussions of the legal notices served by IIPM..
Mridula
Oct 14th, 2005 at 5:49 am | #
Examining some of the questions and answers
(some of them raised by me but not on my blog) given by so called IIPM people blogs.
Deepanjan Nag
Oct 14th, 2005 at 6:03 am | #
Visit my comment @ http://deepanjannag.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-fiasco.html
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 14th, 2005 at 6:07 am | #
burning laptops!!! crazy act. if, just a thought, if we resort to burning the books ‘count ur …’ in front of IIPM??? how would mr.ponytail like it??
karthik venkat
Oct 14th, 2005 at 6:35 am | #
three cheers to the collective power of the indian blogosphere!
http://degreecopy.blogspot.com/2005/10/hes-been-jammed.html
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 14th, 2005 at 6:39 am | #
here’s a comment from rashmi bansal’s blog….
At 1:23 PM, Vinayak said…
I study at the London School of Economics, and just to make sure everything is in order, Ray Richardson is not a professor. He is a reader, and is deputy director, but Prof. Raymond Richardson isn’t the right title for him, it’s Dr. Richardson! Oh wait… what do you know… it’s on IIPM’s home page
Santosh Singh
Oct 14th, 2005 at 6:42 am | #
I support you gaurav and rashmi.IIPM has shown its mental insolvency and i strongly believe that IBM should have taken a step further and supported Gaurav, do they care more for sales… what if we bloggers start buring our IBMs…. do they know how many bloggers use IBM.. think..
Abhishek
Oct 14th, 2005 at 6:58 am | #
I just signed the online petetion!!
And I posted on this topic. Please add me to the list of bloggers. http://www.abhishekk.blogspot.com
Indianf1fan
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:06 am | #
I also thot I will see what Gawker has written.
FOund some interesting points to share: Desipundits its worth to be a part of the update:
In the research & publication of both IMI and EBMS, so called European Schools of Management, we will find this and am producing this as found on the website.
#1.
“A must for every Indian. Read the agony of the nation and solutions to be a world leader in the epic tome..” This text was found on the right below the Great Indian Dream.
Now let IIPM tell us how are they selling this in Europe?
#2.
“A look into Germany’s Enduring Technological Miracle ” this is found above a book titled Indian Economy Review
We are all fools right???
#3. Strategic Innovators…
Ratan & his Mission called Tata
In this issue…
India Benchmarked: Ratan and his mission called Tata
Guest Column: Sweet Innovation
Insurance FDI: Right or Left?
Country Analysis: Confoederatio Helvetica (Switzerland): The Little Wonder
As you sow, so shall you reap
The Menacing Mutilation of Multilateralism
Getting Inventory right
Sector Analysis: Oil & Conflict Risks: Key prevention Strategies
Page of Excellence: Featuring Mr. Gurcharan Das ”
This is the last of their books featured, you will note that it has almost a dead topic on FDI in insurance…Any takers from IIPM
All the book covers seem to be of Indian ethos and the text running along side seem international only they should tell us how they worked on that.
A google search on Book on couple of titles, Strategic Innovators and Human Factor did not result any link to the said publication for almost first five pages at google.
No Alumni listed there, may be no students ever studied…
The Photo Album sucks looks like alate night party rather than a b-school affair. The cross country trip is worse as if it was a familytrip for the guys featured here.
http://www.timi.edu/gallery/studentparty2004/index.htm
Pretty disgusting stuff and IIPM has alliances with these….real pathetic story….
Sarbajit
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:24 am | #
Is there any way to confirm that the so-called email legal notices were indeed sent by IIPM?
Whoever’s received a “notice”, dont delete it from your mailbox. You could get Rs.1 crore in compensation per email…
Bloggers Unite!!
Neil
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:27 am | #
Thumbs up!!
Me too lazy to prove a point! But if push comes to a shove, I will be there!
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:33 am | #
http://sleepyface.blogspot.com/2005/10/snippets.html
Mukundan
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:52 am | #
Check out
http://mmukundan.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-controversy.html
I too, have tried to do my part in this!
Pallavi
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:52 am | #
heres extending my support..
Mahesh
Oct 14th, 2005 at 8:05 am | #
You know you dont even have to look far in blowing holes in IIPM’s stories. They have created enough inconsistencies for themselves in all the data thats put up on their own website and their affiliates. I have put my effort in showcasing the same at http://maheshnat.blogspot.com . Some of the gaffes are positively ridiculous. The case of IIPM vs. Bloggers is going be immortalized in the form of business cases of corporate ethics at all leading B-schools. May be the only way IIPM can connect to any of the ivy league eh?
Aishwarya Rao
Oct 14th, 2005 at 8:38 am | #
In Defence of Gaurav Sabnis
When Indian courts are still dealing with defamation in traditional media, a new form – web defamation (through Blogs) seems to have taken the blogworld by storm (despite the fact that traditional media has been extremely sluggish in carrying this war to the masses and is busy writing snippets on who committed suicide where).
The IIPM Vs Bloggers case prompted me to prepare my defense for blogger Gaurav Sabnis. Here is my case
Getting the Basics Right
The Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech to every citizen of the country. Article 19 of the Indian constitution states that all citizens have the right to freedom of speech and expression. This means that every citizen of the country is free to criticize anything from films, religion, politics, government, bureaucracy to even politicians. Free speech is also protected by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
(The legal cell of IIPM headed by Mr. A. Saxena, could have bothered to clarify this before threatening to sue Gaurav)
What can IIPM sue Gaurav for?
When Saxena says –
“This notice is with respect to your releasing totally false articles about IIPM on the website blogspot.com (reference blogger.com) that has your clear reference and that has been released by you with proven deliberate and fraudulent intentions to harm the image of IIPM and related businesses. The articles have caused unfathomable damage to the reputation of IIPM and to its various operational areas. The articles further have affected innumerable future operations of IIPM� , he is struggling to tell Gaurav that he might sue him for defamation and specifically for libel.
Before we proceed let us understand both the terms in question.
Defamation is an “attack” on the reputation of a person (Here a company or a corporation is also treated like a natural person). It is called libel if it is in writing and is known as slander if it is spoken (or any temporary form).
Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code defines Defamation as under – Whoever by words, either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said except in specified cases, to defame the person.
It is not enough just to know the definition of defamation.It is imperative to know that under the Indian Constitution the law of defamation has been framed only to prevent a person from indulging in unnecessary or unwarranted or false criticism rising possibly out of malice or personal vendetta and thereby laying down standards of speech and writing.
This implies that Gaurav cannot be held for defamation because
1.He didn’t not falsely criticize IIPM. His opinions were based on facts contained in the article published by JAM Magazine. In blog defamation settlements abroad it has been held that if a blogger links to defamatory content, the blogger cannot be ordinarily held liable for defamation.2. He had no malice or personal vendetta against Arindam or IIPM
Secondly Gaurav if sued can be sued for libel.
Libel is
1.Publication of a false and defamatory statement tending to injure the reputation of another person without justification or excuse; -
Gaurav can’t be held for defamation under this clause since his first post itself is linked to the article in JAM Magazine
2.In some permanent form e.g. written, printed, pictures, statue, waxwork, effigy, caricature, signs or picture marks on walls;
Again this doesn’t explicitly include blogs, though this rule can be applicable.
3.Under (English) Law, is both a civil & criminal wrong;
4.Is by itself, an infringement of the right to reputation and no actual damage need be proved. I am assuming that the IIPM legal team noticed just this when they say ‘Even though the damage caused by your deliberate and fraudulent intentions cannot be calculated…’
Thirdly the Indian Penal code, in the clause specifying Defamation of a Company/Corporation contains that the defamation shall be
–Not actionable per se, if the statement in question refers to the personal character or reputation of its officers. That is Gaurav cannot be sued for comparing Arindam to Parnab Mukherjee.Now that the case has been clearly stated, let us see the three defences that Gaurav has.
Defences
Justification by truth
·The principle behind this defence is that the law will not permit a man to recover damages in respect of an injury for character, which either he does not, or ought not to possess
Fair and bonafide comment
·A fair and bona fide statement in matters of public interest (for example, pertaining to books, pictures, theaters, concerts, local authorities etc.) will not constitute a libel.
Since Gaurav has posted his blog in good intention in order to protect the future of several MBA aspirants, he shall be rightfully defended for making a fair statement in public interest.
·The term “fair” in this context means that it must be honest and relevant to the context but not tainted with malice
·The comment must be based on true facts, though they may be slightly exaggerated
Privilege
Qualified Privilege – which is available to a speaker for communication made in the course of legal/social/moral duty, for self—protection, for protection of common interest and for public good; reports of Parliamentary and judicial proceedings and proceedings at public meetings
Last word
I cannot express in those many words the disgust I feel for IIPM. With my arguments, I just want to reiterate that everyone has a right to disagree, oppose, vary in opinion and criticize an injustice. So dear Gaurav, of course IIPM can go ahead and sue you. But they ‘ll lose.
In case they file a suit,simply countersue them for costs and legal fees.
Straight Curves
Oct 14th, 2005 at 9:37 am | #
I don’t know what I can say beyond what has been already. In the end, I hope sense and sensibility do finally prevail!
Inshallah. Amen. Bhagwaan kare. etcetera.
Sridevi
Oct 14th, 2005 at 9:53 am | #
It’s an interesting discussion- I certainly feel that it is important to maintain our freedom of speech in the blog world- after all, a blog is an online journal of one’s opinions and thoughts. And everybody is absolutely entitled to an opinion.
And the way the writers claiming to be IIPM students have been responding is totally off-putting.
Suhail Kazi
Oct 14th, 2005 at 10:06 am | #
Some more unhatched eggs from IIPM’s basket. Check out the extra-ordinary strategic course on MS-Word. All about creating files/folders. I am amazed by the bleeding-edge mgmnt education imparted at IIPM.
Ravi
Oct 14th, 2005 at 10:22 am | #
http://ravikumar.blogdrive.com/archive/303.html
Piyush Garyali
Oct 14th, 2005 at 11:07 am | #
Just noticed this,
http://piyushgaryali.blogspot.com/2005/10/what-could-have-been-funnier.html
Narain
Oct 14th, 2005 at 11:22 am | #
I support free speech. I support expression of speech. IIPM’s Anirdam should be publically questioned. Rashmi, I support you.
Pupil
Oct 14th, 2005 at 11:38 am | #
My contribution to the efforts is a piece of satire. I hope you will feature it and that I will receive constructive feedback (no Mr. A, lawsuits are not feedback).
Regards,
Santosh
Ashish Gupta
Oct 14th, 2005 at 11:46 am | #
I guess with all these links and noise, IIPM is justifiably doomed forever! Our next step has to be to make other people who do not follow blogs aware of this, because lots of independent bloggers has dug up quite a lot of detective stuff about IIPM partners/offices/websites/etc. May be someone can read all these links (!) and summarize on one page?
Narain
Oct 14th, 2005 at 12:00 pm | #
My take in Tamil – http://urpudathathu.blogspot.com/2005/10/blog-post_14.html
mandar
Oct 14th, 2005 at 12:17 pm | #
I have got a lawyer friend to analyze IIPM’s notice for us.
You can read his take at: Dissecting IIPM’s “First Notice of Legal Summons”
R.
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:22 pm | #
Just to let you guys know that I’m in it too
R.
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:24 pm | #
Just wanted to let you guys know my support too!
tECHJ
Oct 14th, 2005 at 1:26 pm | #
they can bringout a full page ad….but they cannot take our freedom of free speach….
count me….
o3.indiatimes.com/chicchatting
Shreyas
Oct 14th, 2005 at 2:09 pm | #
new words n this at http://usandthem.rediffblogs.com
Varna
Oct 14th, 2005 at 3:13 pm | #
Mr. Saxena has just outdone himself. He has left a threatending comment on my Blog. For those who don’t know: IIPM has officially denied sending me a notice. I want to put myself in the clear. Here I respond to Mr. Saxena’s comment on my blog: http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/sinking-to-new-lows.html
Ankur Raheja
Oct 14th, 2005 at 3:21 pm | #
I support Gaurav for having shown courage and standing by his words.
Cheers !!!
A Raheja
Advocate, Delhi High Court
http://www.ankurraheja.com/weblog
http://www.cyberlawyer.in
Ashutosh
Oct 14th, 2005 at 4:32 pm | #
‘Bloggers against IIPM’ community created on Orkut
http://ashujo.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-on-orkut-orkut-is-large-community.html
rohan
Oct 14th, 2005 at 4:32 pm | #
Its now on NDTV.com
check out the link
http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmorestory.asp?category=National&slug=Row+over+IIPM+blogs&id=79968
suresh
Oct 14th, 2005 at 4:53 pm | #
hello frns,
iam a student of IIPM.i know wat iam getting frm IIPM. pls do check the facts with some students and start comenting on any institute. you people here talk about freedom of speech. i respect that and appreciate that but that doesn’t give you right to malign one’s reputation. IIPM has done a PR blunder by serving notices to these people. but doesn’t mean inistiute is any way bad. i can defend this at any place.
Another strange behaviour i found here -any one who supports IIPM is man of arindam choudry. pls heaven sake people like us also shld have our say.
i can safely say IIPM’s standard is far better than so many institutes that have accrediation from AICTE.
People pls do understand how much it takes to grow reputation of a institue.pls don’t tarnish image of an institute without knowing the facts.
Frns pls don’t act in haste.
sunil
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:04 pm | #
Yet another one from me, looking at it from a “management perspective”
http://balancinglife.blogspot.com/2005/10/client-needs-and-product-features.html
Thalassa Mikra
Oct 14th, 2005 at 8:48 pm | #
Mr. Saini,
May I respectfully submit that please speak for yourself. I know fairly well what the issues involved are, none of which are addressed in your comment. Also, like several others posted by IIPM students and alumni you make this needlessly into an IIM-IIPM issue, which it most certainly is not.
prope//er
Oct 14th, 2005 at 9:43 pm | #
Thanks for your effort in portraying the combined strength against babu-dom, hope this changes the mindset of corporations back home. I think IIPM conducted itself very poorly, anyway, I had blogged a while ago. We saw what happened to Pradyuman Maheshwari. Lets not let this happen again.
Thanks
prope//er
http://clorange.com/?p=156
prope//er
Oct 14th, 2005 at 9:45 pm | #
Thanks for your effort in portraying the combined strength against babu-dom, hope this changes the mindset of corporations back home. I think IIPM conducted itself very poorly. We saw what happened to Pradyuman Maheshwari. Lets not waver this time.
Thanks
prope//er
http://clorange.com/?p=156
Bachelor
Oct 14th, 2005 at 10:22 pm | #
Bring out the writer in you! Weave a story! Watch your story unfold with your fellow bloggers.New twists, new turns while this absurd fiction goes places. See your story through virtual eyes.
Visit my blog for more details.
http://www.bachelorblues.blogspot.com
Joy. D
Oct 14th, 2005 at 11:41 pm | #
Such insititues of dubious claims dot the Indian educational system in large numbers which robs of the innocent students and parents who fall in their traps. The fees that are charged by such institutes are really large and they thrive because of people’s patience and acceptance of mediocrity. Accountability has lost its meaning in the moral fabric of Indian society and it is time we start to demand answers from corrupt systems. Keep it up blogosphere and all the people who are blogging about the subject keep the flame burning untill IIPM learns its lessons.
Kanishka
Oct 15th, 2005 at 12:18 am | #
Wow!! I had written about the same in the month of July and suddenly started getting a few comments, nearly 3 months later, apparently by IIPM alumni and current O&M guys (advertising agency). Check them here
http://kanishkaagiwal.blogspot.com/2005/07/thok-sako-to-thok-lo.html
Definitely stand by Gaurav and Rashmi.
http://kanishkaagiwal.blogspot.com
Prachi D
Oct 15th, 2005 at 12:49 am | #
I don’t have any opinion on this IIPM business. Its gotten way out of whack for everyone involved and has led to far too much unpleasantness and drama. I liked the pre-fiasco blogosphere. A cozy little community of people writing because they liked to. Insulated from the crazy politics and controversies of the world outside. Those were the good days !
But I do think that ‘Rok sako to rok lo’ is a ridiculous name for a movie. It sounds like someone with an upset stomach.
Bonatellis
Oct 15th, 2005 at 1:02 am | #
1. Communication from the institute to a leading global corp: http://daytimeruminations.blogspot.com/2005/10/some-more-on-guru.html
2. Is the institute website spamming popular search engines: http://daytimeruminations.blogspot.com/2005/10/continuing-with-guru.html
Alex
Oct 15th, 2005 at 1:15 am | #
I am glad this whole thing is blowing up in IIPM’s face.
Those publicity guys at IIPM who keep churning out all that IIPM and Arindham Chaudhari balderdash must surely be ruing their acts.
Praveen Gopal Krishnan
Oct 15th, 2005 at 1:58 am | #
Allo,
Me a journalist with the Economic Times in Chennai, been hounding these IIPM people for the last two days on this story but they just seem to be re-directing me to the “concerned department” continuously, haven’t had any comment from anyone, acceptance nor denial.
Me thinks they are sending me on one wild goose circular chase.
They will be sorry.
Praveen
P.S: My blog URL. Count me in.
Praveen Gopal Krishnan
Oct 15th, 2005 at 2:02 am | #
That’s
http://www.wildegoosechase.blogspot.com
Mridula
Oct 15th, 2005 at 2:19 am | #
My dean just came and told me he saw the controversy on NDTV and says it was probably mentioned on CNBC. I went to movie a yesterday as a cure for a headache and missed it but did anyone else see it? Any repeat telecasts?
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 15th, 2005 at 2:47 am | #
http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=208
Zzats ethan zuckerman joining in!
Mridula
Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:13 am | #
Do you know how many names are there in that big block starting from Harini and at the monemt ending at ~J~? I counted. Why more than 247 people believe Rashmi, Gaurav and Desipundit more than mainstream media (I did a google news search and to see what mainstream media has been writing prior to this fiasco)?
Srijith
Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:35 am | #
Joichi “Joi” Ito, VC, Creative Commons board member etc. joins in.
wise donkey
Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:56 am | #
http://wisedonkey.blogspot.com/2005/10/aargh-diaries-to-blog-and-be-sued.html
All the best:)
Anantha
Oct 15th, 2005 at 4:43 am | #
At the risk of sounding like a wet blanket lemme urge all ye bloggers to move on. The world knows about IIPM now. Thanks to the unified action by all of us, no one will dare to prosecute our fellow bloggers. Gaurav Sabnis will get a better job (i hope). IIPM will watch their back before doing anything stupid….I say this, because a lot many futures are at stake. To my knowledge close to a 1000 people are currently students at IIPM. The more muck we throw at IIPM, the more we are endangering the potential careers of these thousand people. Think about it. Put yourself in the shoes of the IIPM students. And act accordingly.
K
Oct 15th, 2005 at 5:20 am | #
http://thalassamikra.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-indian-politics-and-why.html
I don’t need to say any more!
Punk EdgE
Oct 15th, 2005 at 5:38 am | #
well to tell u the truth …(he who shud not be named) is one of the reasons i dont keep a pony tail. since always i hav always thought this mr. u know who is always full of crap and their ads always shot over the phenko limit. all brag and nothing credible to show off. his name associations hav been to much to digest .. and writing ones PERSONAL opinion on a PERSONAL space is LEGAL…lets sue him for trespassing the PERSONAL space.
psst:: BEWARE people trespassing my blog can be SUED/BEATEN for evasion of my privacy
)
Somu
Oct 15th, 2005 at 6:49 am | #
More from my side…
Arindam Chaudhuri’s own quotes contradicting with reality !!
http://psomu.blogspot.com/2005/10/long-live-gaurav-long-live-rashmi.html
Varun
Oct 15th, 2005 at 8:34 am | #
I had a comment on my blog questioning why I was hell bent on ruining the future of the students at IIPM.
I have replied to it.
You might want to add something to my response or debate the issue further…
Varun
Oct 15th, 2005 at 8:40 am | #
IIPM releases an official statement to journalists…
http://presstalk.blogspot.com/2005/10/official-statement.html
ramses
Oct 15th, 2005 at 8:49 am | #
http://o3.indiatimes.com/applesandwomen/archive/2005/10/15/291653.aspx#Comments
that’s my other blog where i’ve given my small take on the whole issue. though it may not be profound…nevertheless showing my support to the blogging community…
* my full support *
Varna
Oct 15th, 2005 at 1:36 pm | #
Hi… I have had a lot of people telling me to verify where my ‘notice’ came from. I have. Read this: http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/last-word.html
Parvathy
Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:00 pm | #
Count me in on the fight. This cannot be tolerated.
puneetworld
Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:13 pm | #
This second part follow up on iipm spamming search engines
IIPM website search engine Spam – How to report to google,yahoo and msn search engines
http://puneetworld.indiablogs.org/archives/2005/10/iipm_website_ca.html
this one focus on how can people help inform the search engine so that they can penalise the iipm website or remove it from their index or take appropriate action so calling all
Tiffin
Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:16 pm | #
A detailed post is on my blog, but in nut:
There are three different issues here:
-False information advertised by IIPM
-Actual quality of IIPM
-Freedom of Speech
JAMMAG wanted to evaluate ‘Actual Quality of IIPM’ but their article is all about ‘False information advertised by IIPM’. What i am trying to say is that instead of focusing on what IIPM offers, they talked only about what IIPM does not offer. The article thus, does not help me judge ‘Actual Quality of IIPM’ in respect to other management institutes or in absoulute sense.
Instead of expected formation of several groups based on their views on these three different topics, unfortunately only two groups emerged. Almost all people (read bloggers) took side based on the ‘Freedom of Speech’ issue. Thus, the debate completely drifted from being about IIPM (either of the first two issues) to ‘freedom of speech’.
JAMMAG who had exercised their ‘Freedom of speech’ to write an article on ‘False information advertised by IIPM’, got tremndous support from bloggers, who (most) had no idea or only little idea (which does not suffice for vehement support) about ‘Actual quality of IIPM’ , thus unconciously teaming up against IIPM and being percieved as agreeing and suggesting that ‘Actual Quality of IIPM’ is very poor.
Vikram
Oct 15th, 2005 at 4:17 pm | #
My god!! Have the IIPMs got themselves into a soup or what??
I’m sure they deserve every bit of the negative publicity that they are garnering at the moment!! I have always despised their advertising gimmicks!
My the devil be more kind to them and their institution!
SV
Oct 15th, 2005 at 4:29 pm | #
I have added this post to my blog. And will request my fellow blogger friends to do so too.
http://sv.typepad.com/forsv/2005/10/the_blogger_and.html
Prasannaa
Oct 15th, 2005 at 5:12 pm | #
Nice job with the updates..!
IIPM sux..
Greatful to you
Oct 15th, 2005 at 5:47 pm | #
hi!!
Arindam Chaudhuri should be jailed.
Criminal he is
bloggerama
Oct 15th, 2005 at 11:49 pm | #
This Malai Chaudhari thingy stinks. Great job bloggers. I think one must investigate Planman Consulting next. Because I smell a rat, there. I mean, which consulting firm in the world makes dud movies (rok sako to rok lo), funds an NGO (the great indian deam foundation), pumps up a management guru (u know who), stages rock shows (if you didn’t know Michael Learns to Rock was brought to India by Planman), launches a magazine (Business & Economy), a political party (Malai chaudhari’s)and works with corporates. My gut feel is Planman was set up to keep the IIPM grads busy. According to the great indian dream foundation website, planman makes 36 crores annually. i have provided this basic grist hoping that many of you bravehearts will investigate planman. i think the results of the investigation will provide us enuf fodder to write a john grisham kinda book or screenplay. may be we can pitch this script to planman later
Vikram
Oct 16th, 2005 at 1:08 am | #
hey there,I have also written small article on this episode. Please check it out!
http://vikramh.blogspot.com/2005/10/blog-squashed.html
Prasannaa
Oct 16th, 2005 at 2:13 am | #
Guess who claims to provides consulting to Mckinsey, Ernst and Young,PWC..
http://www.planmanconsulting.com/founder.html
screen dump of the same on http://whencorneredconfuse.blogspot.com/
Maybe, THIS should be validated as well!!!
Sai
Oct 16th, 2005 at 3:06 am | #
I have been following the incident. But i have few concerns:
What is the aim of this fight ?
I mean when will the fight end ? Do we want a public apology from Arindham C ? Or do we want someone to uphold the rights of a blogger legally ? Or do we want compensation for Gaurav,Rashmi and Varna ?
Just a covering in the mainstream media will not do much justice. I know that the wannabe students will be alarmed by all this Technorati ranking, but that is not the PRIME and FIRST motive of this discussion , right ? Gaurav too will get his job back at IBM or he shall get somewhere else once the discussion cools down and gets old.
I suggest this to be taken up legally. Can we not file a case against IIPM ? Or is it already being done ? Or should we wait for their next step, and what if there is no next step ?
We all remember nothing happened to those exposed by the sting operations by Tehelka even after wide media coverage and awareness…I am afraid the bloggers voice is too weak to cause serious enough damage or to get an apology.
What I feel is, we need to act.
Those are my thoughts. Hopeful of a reply.
Rgds,
Sai
Indeevar Kaul
Oct 16th, 2005 at 3:51 am | #
The IIPM controversy
The controversy revolving around IIPM, Rashmi Bansal and Gaurav Sabnis is just atip of an ice-berg. There are many others who are looting students year after year in the name of education and degrees with false promises. I admire JAMMAG/Rashmi Bansal and Gaurav Sabnis for the strength and conviction they have shown to reveal the truth. I am surprised at the reaction of IIPM and its students. Do we accept the age old saying, “might is right” and let them attack the bloggers and journalists and curb the right to free speech. I admire Gaurav Sabnis for his actions and the inaction and inability of IBM to support Gaurav is depressing.
I wish we could have more Gauravs and Rashmis with us.
Let the truth prevail.
New blog on blogspot to support Gaurav and Rashmi (Free speech).
http://weirdpoet.blogspot.com/
Jagan
Oct 16th, 2005 at 3:55 am | #
In case the IIPM topguns atlast realise that they have messed up big time and start distancing themselves from the legal notices aka threats,
Can the recipients of these shady correspondences record their full headers here please? For the record!
IK
Oct 16th, 2005 at 3:56 am | #
The IIPM controversy
The controversy revolving around IIPM, Rashmi Bansal and Gaurav Sabnis is just atip of an ice-berg. There are many others who are looting students year after year in the name of education and degrees with false promises. I admire JAMMAG/Rashmi Bansal and Gaurav Sabnis for the strength and conviction they have shown to reveal the truth. I am surprised at the reaction of IIPM and its students. Do we accept the age old saying, “might is right” and let them attack the bloggers and journalists and curb the right to free speech. I admire Gaurav Sabnis for his actions and the inaction and inability of IBM to support Gaurav is depressing.
I wish we could have more Gauravs and Rashmis with us.
Let the truth prevail.
My link on blogspot to support the free speech.
http://weirdpoet.blogspot.com
Devdutt
Oct 16th, 2005 at 4:11 am | #
My support here.
Eshwar
Oct 16th, 2005 at 4:35 am | #
I support freedom of speech and expression. Anybody opposing it should be squashed.
Invincible
Oct 16th, 2005 at 6:23 am | #
I read their statement. The stiffness in their attitude hasnt waned a bit !!
They are also threatening of legal action, but should Gaurav, Rashmi, Varna have to wait till IIPM makes their move?
They have also very categorically avoided disclosing facts on the claims raised by JAM.
What if they dont sue anyone, including the JAM mag. Gaurav wud never get justice. Desparate students would still stand in long queues outside IIPM when the next course starts. Read on Puneet’s blog @ spamming. Will that really help. Will the online petition ever make it to the court of law.
After a month or two, everyone wud forget what hppnd in this slice of time.
Bhavdeep S Virdi
Oct 16th, 2005 at 7:56 am | #
I support. You should see the IIPM building in Madras. Its a small place. But the photo on the IIPM website looks like the building is some 15 stories.
Also please stop Arindam Chaudhari from making Movies like – ROK SAKO TOH ROK LO…
debu chow
Oct 16th, 2005 at 9:05 am | #
i totally support your movement. its time ponytailed idiots come to know the true power of blogging and free speech (it cant be squashed).
is there any way for me 2 help?
girija
Oct 16th, 2005 at 12:52 pm | #
Saw this quote on the IMI forum website:
“If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts.” – Albert Einstein
- (Added by: Camiel Jeurissen): on IMI Forum page
http://www.timi.edu/forum/logon.asp?error=needregistration
IRONIC, wouldn’t you say??
vivek
Oct 16th, 2005 at 3:01 pm | #
Rashmi and Gaurav did a good thing to expose the phoney and false claims of IIPM…. Its good to find that how powerful blogs can be …. IIPM has been offering degrees which are not even recognised in India….
I personally thank rashmi and gaurav to bring everything to light about IIPM…..
vivek durairaj
Oct 16th, 2005 at 5:30 pm | #
i am still wondering about the strength of blogs in bringing out the truth. i have also shown my support to Rashmi and Gaurav in my blog.
http://www.findingtheroot.blogspot.com
Arun
Oct 16th, 2005 at 11:49 pm | #
Here is me adding my bit:
surplusmusings.blogspot.com
Chandresh Prakash
Oct 17th, 2005 at 1:47 am | #
My Thoughts:
Is Gaurav Really being wholly truthful – the IIPM Vs the bloggers
Arka Mukhopadhyay
Oct 17th, 2005 at 3:36 am | #
Hello,
You said no updates, so I don’t know if this makes sense, but after I put up the post proposing the protest idea (we’re going through with it next Monday), I’ve had an annonymouse comment from someone claiming to be a student of IIPM, Bangalore, threatening “we’ll be waiting for you.” I’ve posted the relevant comment as an update to the post on my blog.
We are trying to garner solidarity for the march from other creative communities (writers, theatre people, etc. ) We’re getting in touch with well-known peole here in Bangalore (Mahesh Dattani etc.) and statements of support from emminent people/academics would be really helpful.
Also, we’re reaching out with flyers etc. to the campuses here, especially to journalism dept.s of colleges.
Amit Wilson
Oct 17th, 2005 at 5:32 am | #
Have added my 2cents on my blog with a post titled “Dare to think beyond the IIMs and we’ll slap you with a law suit.”
catinator.blogspot.com
Chittaranjan
Oct 17th, 2005 at 6:39 am | #
“Dare to think beyond IIM”.If someone is giving it a try let them to do it.I would compare it with caste system prevalent in India.that the caste lower in rung should not take on upper castes
I don’t think Gourav is any one to comment on design aspect,what is his competency in this matter.He is just out of college and pointing fingers.
Just think of the students out there and how itz going to impact there future.Letz not try to dictate terms and allow people to do what they feel is right
rajesh
Oct 17th, 2005 at 6:46 am | #
Gaurav should file a case against IIPM and ask for his life security.
Varna
Oct 17th, 2005 at 7:49 am | #
On Andy’s ‘Varna Apologises’ blog and related posts…
http://absurdiav.blogspot.com/2005/10/on-language-idiots.html
Mridula
Oct 17th, 2005 at 7:51 am | #
Have you people seen the Noam Chomsky and Steve Ballmer (both fake blogs) blogs? Technorati search will take you there. Or it is also at
http://traveltalesfromindia.blogspot.com/2005/10/latest-cheap-stunt-in-iipm-saga.html
pankaj
Oct 17th, 2005 at 8:27 am | #
IIPM, Indian politics, and why Government of India websites are so fun
Click here
http://thalassamikra.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-indian-politics-and-why.html
Prasannaa
Oct 17th, 2005 at 12:45 pm | #
… How is this possible?!
http://www.iipm.edu/iipm-history.html says
..”After resigning from Professorship at IIM Bangalore (Indian Institute of Management), Dr. M. K. Chaudhuri established the Institute in 1973. Dr. Chaudhuri, AFTER having been a Professor at XLRI Jamshedpur, XIM Bhubaneshwar, and having been the founder director of management courses at IMT Ghaziabad, took over as Research Professor and founder Director. The first residential full-time Post-Graduate Diploma Programme commenced on 12th August 1974″
And according to http://www.imt.edu/
IMT Ghaziabad was founded IN 1980. How pray, did Dr. Chaudhuri start IIPM AFTER being founder director of IMT?!
Mridula
Oct 18th, 2005 at 1:53 am | #
Another interesting mention at Instapundit of IIPM(if this has been posted earlier, sorry for double posting)
http://instapundit.com/archives/026232.php
Jaswinder
Oct 18th, 2005 at 2:14 am | #
How about raising the stakes against IIPM and taking the battle to where they would care. Check out some viral suggestions at my blog
Pradeep
Oct 18th, 2005 at 2:57 am | #
Got to know about this only today. So adding my bit :
http://questor.blogspot.com
Vishnu Vyas
Oct 18th, 2005 at 5:34 pm | #
Hey, you guys are doing a great job and both Gaurav and Rashmi need our support!
Sunita
Oct 19th, 2005 at 12:40 am | #
I have been reading about this IIPM issue for the last 2 days and what really puts me off is the way the institute (“reputed” as they claim) & its students reacted to it.
…should be fun to watch them sweat.
I think Gaurav should sue them back for the mental stress & time waste & his loss of money
Nidhi Gupta
Oct 19th, 2005 at 3:07 am | #
it’s an outrageous act..seems like these people had nothin better to do ..or mebbe they wantd sm fame in their life by piggybacking on the good reputation Rashmi and Gaurav have garnered in all these months..But as they say..gud ppl have to go thru many tough phases in their life..juss to make them tougher..so all the best to Rashmi and Gaurrav..juss have faith on ur integrity..u’ll come out of it with flying colors
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 19th, 2005 at 10:07 am | #
here’s what MSNBC says about it!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3395977/
IIPM Watchdog
Oct 19th, 2005 at 5:15 pm | #
Well Varna discovered that IIPM.edu is hosted at http://thewebhostingpeople.com/
… we found iipm.info and it’s being hosted at http://theunixhostingpeople.com/
we pulled up the record on the domain from godaddy re iipm.info and the details are here:
http://iipmwatch.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipminfo-and-another-page-on-tripodcom.html
We’re beind every single blogger and student or anyone else IIPM has wronged!
Blog On!
IIPM Watchdog
Oct 20th, 2005 at 7:26 am | #
Read on …..Dr. Malay Chaudhuri on the best style of governance!
http://iipmwatch.blogspot.com/2005/10/dr-malay-chaudhuri-on-best-style-of.html
Anonymous
Oct 20th, 2005 at 10:13 am | #
Can u believe this?
http://www.hindu.com/mp/2005/10/20/stories/2005102000990100.htm
IIPM Watchdog
Oct 20th, 2005 at 7:32 pm | #
Guess who’s IIPM’s lawyers?
http://iipmwatch.blogspot.com/2005/10/guess-whos-iipms-lawyersattorneys.html
Arka Mukhopadhyay
Oct 21st, 2005 at 1:02 am | #
Hi,
Sent this to patrix by mail as well. We have created an online petition and also created an e-mail meant to be sent around as a forward. The text is carried on my blog. We request all bloggers to carry it as a post on their blogs, sign the petition, and mail the statement to their contacts.
Arka
AV
Oct 21st, 2005 at 1:18 am | #
I still can’t make out what is this website all about. Can anyone clarify please. Though for that matter I spent only a minute or so out here since I landed on this site by accident. Will take another look next time round. thanks!
IIPM Watchdog
Oct 21st, 2005 at 5:37 am | #
http://static.flickr.com/29/54533084_e5e7037f31_o.png
Avik
Oct 21st, 2005 at 8:17 pm | #
Read my post http://surgingwaves.blogspot.com/2005/10/iipm-controversy.html
Vishnupriya Sharma
Oct 22nd, 2005 at 7:05 am | #
http://sleepyface.blogspot.com/2005/10/management-mantras.html
Angelo Embuldeniya (Crazy Strav)
Oct 22nd, 2005 at 1:35 pm | #
Look here:
http://stravinskyss.blogspot.com/2005/10/dont-let-iipm-fool-you-destroy-your_22.html
A reply I received from a guest speaker at IIPM campuses this month from the University of Cambridge who states that IIPM are all about training and she wouldn’t advise anyone to do their degree there cos IIPM degrees aren’t validated by anyone….
an honest response from someone who IIPM likes to claim as they’re global faculty!
I hope her name doesn’t get used by IIPM to boast that the IIPM faculty are from the University of Cambridge in their next ad!!!
Cheers!
Harish
Oct 22nd, 2005 at 5:09 pm | #
It is interesting to see that the IIPM website has the domain .edu. A note below is from wikipedia about the institutions having an .edu domain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.edu
“Under the present system, only post-secondary institutions that are accredited by an agency on the U.S. Department of Education’s list of Nationally Recognized Accrediting Agencies are eligible to apply for a .edu domain. Most such agencies accredit only US institutions, so very few non-US institutions qualify, and .edu remains an almost exclusively American top-level domain.”
However an exception is if they had applied for the domain much earlier.
Allan
Oct 22nd, 2005 at 7:05 pm | #
I just found this blog battle, and have not had time to review all the evidence presented.
I have included a reference to this at the Bastiat Free University blog. Our students may learn by observation or participation, and are free to act as they see the opportunity.
http://bfuniv.blogspot.com/2005/10/controversy-and-blogs-for-dispersed.html
Overall the bloggers responses seem to have reflected a pursuit of truth.
The dispersed research shows great power and effectiveness.
I will probably post again once I have more complete knowledge.
This is in reality an extended meeting to discuss a topic of importance to all of us.
Freedom of speech and the power of connection.
Allan
anish
Oct 24th, 2005 at 2:00 am | #
kinda late for this, but i get to be number 401 !
my thoughts : http://anish7.blogspot.com/2005/10/and-justice-for-all_23.html
nabeel
Oct 24th, 2005 at 4:24 am | #
hey hi guys
i wanted to know more abt IIPM n also a bit of ICFAI my cousin is plannin to join IIPm, sp i needed the guidance please send it to my mail nabeel007@gmail.com
IIPMite
Oct 24th, 2005 at 8:28 am | #
ive read enuf of this stuff….
funny how evry1 seems to be an expert on my college. declaring it a fraud and so on. yes, entry to my college is easier than a lot of other college… but does that nessecarily make iipm bad/fraud/rest of the bul*** .
Infact im greatful it gave me a chance to pursue a worldclass MBA programme.(please there is no argument about course content and as far as faculties are concerned they are they same bunch that that teach at IIT,IIFT,FMS and IMI)plus how many B-schools students can boast to attended lectures from Kotler,Steven Covey,Joel Stein or Zig Zigler(to name a few) but i can.
im not defending any action or criticising the right to free speech …. but yes irresponsible unckecked banter/lies/ can harm ppl(read students) more whom every1 seems to b concerned about.
to end i will give u a true fact im a second year IIPM delhi student … who has been placed in an korean electronics major(read NO.1 consumer durables in india) with a CTC of 4.5L pa. through campus 2 weeks ago.and the placement season has just started. I leave for the the readers to judge about my college…… not that IIPM needs ne 1s aproval.
raapi
Oct 24th, 2005 at 1:37 pm | #
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2005%20Opinion%20Editorials/October/21o/Blogging%20in%20Asia%20Aint%20Safe%20No%20More%20By%20Zafar%20Anjum.htm
-Raapi
Forrestgump
Oct 24th, 2005 at 8:37 pm | #
Is IIPM still suing people or have they given up after Varna? I really want one of those 175 crore lawsuits.
Rish
Oct 25th, 2005 at 3:48 am | #
I had started reading the Great Indian Dream a few days ago and actually came across this issue on the web via OSS channels. It is indeed a sad affair. Methink IIPM should really rethink their stand on this issue [not that it is likely to happen] and just come out clean, and take this as a learning experience. Just my 0.02 bytes worth.
Rahul
Oct 25th, 2005 at 2:08 pm | #
I dont know how my blog appeared on this site at comment no. 407 but I am very happy nevertheless.
I have a friend who is studying in IIPM …….but the problem is that he wont believe my words ..but to be frank he’s not likin it himself….its crap from the inside too ……
just my 2 paisa….
Also can someone please start a petition to stop internet censorship…i have drafted a bit but still it should be powerful.Please some1 start
Mihir Sambhus
Oct 25th, 2005 at 2:56 pm | #
This is fantastic support! I appreciate the effort and fully support the fight!
http://www.desihub.com/blog/page/mihir/20051013#indian_blogosphere_heating_up
-mihir
Prasad
Oct 26th, 2005 at 6:38 am | #
That’s the way to go!! hope that this wave will bring about many such ‘IIPM’s’ lurking around.
ten
Oct 26th, 2005 at 6:54 am | #
I am not sure of the current state of affairs at IIPM. As far as their ad goes in the media declaring to think above the IIM`s. I guess they have the right to say what they feel about their institution. As far as issues regarding the accrediation of IIPM is concerned. The states where IIPM is operating have their own laws governing the educational institutions operating in the state.
I also empathize with the fact that the students of IIPM strongly for their institute.
What is not acceptable is the manner in which the mail was sent to gaurav and rashmi. Its tone was less a legal notice and more of a threat to cause incovenience mentally or financially.
If Arindam wants to repudiate the comments made on him. He should do so by bringing a white paper on the matter. If he can issue front page ad`s in national dailies about his institute. And that if the blog of Gaurav can cause losses of the tune of 125 crores, then i am sure Arindam has the necessary urgency and the resources to protect his and IIPM`s reputation.
So i am waiting for Arindam to ward off the claims in the blog and come clean. The cheap theatrics of trying to intimidate someone airing his views is not acceptable and tolerable.
Redeem yourself and your students faith in you arindam the right way if you feel so strongly about the whole issue.
Rahul
Oct 26th, 2005 at 8:33 am | #
FYI guys….Arindam Chaudry had made a movie called Rok Sako TO Rok LO …..does anyone rem it……Sunny Deol and Namrata Shirdkar ^_^
smOOthOperatOr
Oct 26th, 2005 at 12:40 pm | #
Man!!!
I feel aghast that the very institute that is supposed to teach ethics and responsibilities does this –
we stand by you guys throught everything
Truth will prevail!!!!
heron
Oct 27th, 2005 at 9:02 am | #
Its clear that only confirmed morons have joined IIPM in the past and there will be many confirmed morons who will join IIPM in the future. No amount of blogging can save any moron from joining IIPM. So IIPM management have actually proved that (a) they are morons when they sued and protested. (b) they don’t know that they are morons and need bloggers to tell them that. (c) they don’t know that their students are morons and need bloggers to tell them that.
Mahesh
Oct 28th, 2005 at 2:07 am | #
Guys,
The continuing saga of lies that the professor has perfected. In the morning newspaper of HT today, there was this ad of their magazine ‘Business & economy’. It starts by claims of EXCLUSIVE columns by Jack Welch and Naom Cmomsky. I wondered about these great people writing for a magazine like B & E and searched the web. Lo and behold, it was avalaible everywhere and the New York times syndicte is selling it for a very very small price. I am sure, if you talk to the looney professor, he will give his own excuses.
sunny
Oct 28th, 2005 at 3:52 am | #
Well, this matter is over.Only worried abt security of some people involved. Is there anybody can suggest HOW IIPM SHOULD HAVE HANDLED THE CASE,
OR should do now as damage reduction exercise…
Any devil’s advocate there ?? This is a challenge to upcoming lawyers and managers….
IIPM Mumbai student
Oct 28th, 2005 at 9:30 am | #
I work in IT MNC. My colleague is IIPM Mumbai Post Graduate of 2003-05 batch. His take home in India is USD 110 per month! He is now working in Europe for the same company. There he draws USD 6000 per month.
I am not interested in proving this to any TOM, DICK or HARRY.
If any IIM students want to challenge this claim, please post your contact info and I will be glad to give you proof. I am especially interested in showing this to the IIM professor who has written about Arindam and IIMP.
IIPM Mumbai student
Oct 28th, 2005 at 5:01 pm | #
His take home in India is USD 1100 per month!
Libu
Oct 28th, 2005 at 5:10 pm | #
USD 1100 take home per month for student of 2003 batch! WOW! Thats cool!
I am woking with Infosys. We have MBA’s from many B schools. I feel IIM guys are at PAR in work to MBA’s from other B schools like Jamnalal, Wellinkars, SP Jain. Also have few guys from IIPM.I feel they too are at PAR with the above mentioned B-Schools.
One problem with IIM guys is they come with lot of ATTITUDE which is washed away when they start cracking real life work problems. Cracking CAT doesnt mean they are good at work.
Mahesh
Oct 29th, 2005 at 4:02 am | #
Has any one seen the ad about Dr. M K choudhury in the Indian express. These guys are going to defend themselves till IIPM vanishes. You would also have seen the stories on CNBC of late. Here is to the death of IIPM.
Weighty issues Next post →
Airlines
Ads
Advertise here
Subscribe
More subscription options
Search
Resident Experts
Baradwaj Rangan Blogical Conclusion
2 days ago
2 days ago
2 days ago
Read more posts
Ashutosh Jogalekar From So Simple a Beginning
17 days ago
19 days ago
32 days ago
Read more posts
Photos
Photo of the week posts | More photos
Bookmarks
10 hours ago
2 days ago
2 days ago
2 days ago
2 days ago
View more bookmarks
Community Members
See All Community Members
Best of DesiPundit
Most Voted On
Most Viewed
About
A Little Wit. A Little Wisdom. Lots of India - This blog brings you the rich variety of opinions posted daily in the Indian blogosphere.
Find out more
Store
Visit our store