Why is it that so many things done by humans are considered artificial, while everything that animals do is considered natural? Other animals, just like humans, also try to modify their environment according to their capabilities and the resources available to them. Then, why is a skyscraper artificial while an ant-hill is natural?
Partly in response to an Gaurav’s post on saving tigers (linked earlier on DesiPundit), Vivek examines the arguments for saving the tiger while trying to understand the larger issue of impact of a species on the planet.
Comments
Comments are closed on this post.