<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freeman Dyson (1923-)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.desipundit.com/ashutosh/2007/09/01/freeman-dyson-1923/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.desipundit.com/ashutosh/2007/09/01/freeman-dyson-1923/</link>
	<description>Inspired by those who ask "why?" and dedicated to those who say "because..."</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Who should be the next Presidential Science Advisor? &#124; From so simple a beginning...</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/ashutosh/2007/09/01/freeman-dyson-1923/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Who should be the next Presidential Science Advisor? &#124; From so simple a beginning...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/ashutosh/2007/09/01/freeman-dyson-1923/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Freeman Dyson: I would have actually picked this distinguished physicist if it weren’t for two reasons- his age, and his curious skepticism about global warming. Dyson also has a peculiar set of opinions about reconciling science and religious or supernatural faith, although I have to say that if he had been offered the post, he would not have let these interfere with objective advice. He has already been on many advisory committees. But I doubt whether, given his austere disposition, he would have liked to be at the center of public affairs (I have written about him here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Freeman Dyson: I would have actually picked this distinguished physicist if it weren’t for two reasons- his age, and his curious skepticism about global warming. Dyson also has a peculiar set of opinions about reconciling science and religious or supernatural faith, although I have to say that if he had been offered the post, he would not have let these interfere with objective advice. He has already been on many advisory committees. But I doubt whether, given his austere disposition, he would have liked to be at the center of public affairs (I have written about him here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.463 seconds -->
