Review: Kya Love Story Hai
LOVE STOREY
An architect messes up the, um, foundations of his romance and tries to alter the, uh, blueprints of his relationship with the girl. Oh never mind.
APR 22, 2007 - THERE’S a beautifully honest scene at the beginning of Kya Love Story Hai. Arjun (Tusshar Kapoor) learns that his friend Kevin has just lost his girlfriend. He rushes to the cemetery, where the service is taking place, but Kevin is nowhere to be found, and one of the mourners points to a figure sitting a little distance away, all by himself. That’s Kevin, of course. Arjun goes over and sits by his side in the awkward way that people usually do in these situations, and he begins to mumble good-intentioned nonsense like “Things will be okay with time,� when Kevin simply says – and this is the good part; he just says this, he doesn’t burst out in anger at these hollow platitudes – that they won’t. This moment is staged very awkwardly – as is most of this movie by first-time director Lovely Singh – but it does its job by effectively laying out the premise of the story to follow. And that’s this: how can anyone else know what you’re feeling unless you tell them? And how can Arjun even presume to know what Kevin is going through when he hasn’t been in love at all? Both these concerns come together as Arjun falls for Kajal (Ayesha Takia). She thinks he’s just a good friend, and how is she supposed to think otherwise if he won’t tell her?
Tusshar Kapoor started out in the movies with this very same dilemma in Mujhe Kuchh Kehna Hai, and he was good there because his bland screen presence – in a just world, he’d be playing the hero’s best friend’s younger brother – was a perfect fit with his guy-next-door. It was easy to imagine him in love with a glamorous goddess like Kareena Kapoor, and it was easier to imagine him quaking in his boots at the prospect of expressing his emotions to this unattainable creature. But Kya Love Story Hai asks us to buy him as an architect with tons of money (ergo, no more guy-next-door) who chooses not to work for a living (ergo, no more sympathy factor) – and so the time never comes in this love-triangle when we root for Kajal to pick Arjun over Ranveer (Karan Hukku, an incredibly wooden newcomer). The way I saw it, if this is the choice Kajal is given, she’s pretty screwed either which way. Because compared to the men, Ayesha Takia is so incredibly alive, you want to quietly kidnap her away to the sets of a better movie. Then again, this is how you recognise someone’s worth. Any reasonably competent actress can sink her teeth into an author-backed role like the one in Dor, but if she can be in this and yet find it in herself to be so good, now that’s a truly remarkable performer.
It’s nice, in a young-love story, to see ambition – not parents, not rich-versus-poor, not religion – being the spanner in the works. Kajal wants someone who’s made a success of himself, which is why she cannot see herself with the idler Arjun. And it’s also nice to see that despite all these rules that Kajal has made for herself, she’s easily persuaded by Ranveer to give up her career (that is, her ambitions). She’s met the man of her dreams, so she’s willing to let go her (other) dreams. But the writing is so bad and the direction so clumsy, these ideas remain mere ideas. They never take off and develop into the kind of romance that would make you exclaim… Kya Love Story Hai! But Pritam does his best to keep us hanging in there. The film kicks off with a terrific item number by Kareena Kapoor (though if the director knew the first thing about making movies, he’d had have saved this number for later; after this burst of colourful energy, it’s all downhill.) But the song that got to me was Gumsum hai dil mera, rousingly sung by Sonu Nigam as if he were channelling Rafi in the Shammi Kapoor era. (The choreography is set in the back of a truck, just like Subhan Allah haai.) Those were silly love stories too, and they had hardly anything going for them except the music and the momentum. But that’s enough, really – for the basic thing about entertainment is that we should not be bored. That’s a lesson today’s filmmakers need to learn. We keep hearing of directors who rip off Oldboy or Reservoir Dogs. Maybe they should try doing that with Professor or Kashmir Ki Kali.
Copyright ©2007 The New Sunday Express
This one’s for you Gaipajama
“it’s also nice to see that despite all these rules that Kajal has made for herself, she’s easily persuaded by Ranveer to give up her career (that is, her ambitions)”
and it is nice to be convinced that after a series of such incredibly gender-just reviews (namastey london started the trend i think), women can now give up on you.
thanks a lot for the good times
rs - uh, what I said was that at first she’s very ambitious, but then she gives up on HER OWN ambitions because she’s met her dream man, and that this shows she’s just a confused kid. She isn’t perfect. Where’s the gender bias in that?
baradwaj: “in a just world, he’d be playing the hero’s best friend’s younger brother” - was this comment tongue in cheek, or you really mean you don’t see talent in Tusshar?
By the way, when I say talent, I mean it in a relative way. Compared with what we usually get in our freshers.
rs - I read the para again and it’s not terribly clear what I intended to say. But the bit in the comment is what I meant. I swear. I’m really a very nice boy, you know…
Manish - I meant he’d be playing unremarkable characters that were not *heroes*. I liked Tusshar in Khakee, for instance. BTW, it’s getting increasingly clear that this review needs a glossary!
“in a just world, he’d be playing the hero’s best friend’s younger brother ”
No one could have said it better
And wasn’t there a remake of Professor, or part of it with shirtless sallu?
Thank you.
Btw, are you hopeful of reviewing a decent movie anytime soon?
“Because compared to the men, Ayesha Takia is so incredibly alive, you want to quietly kidnap her away to the sets of a better movie..”
some1 shd really help her out in choosing movies..salaam e ishq n now this..
an article by pritish nandy (about “the gr8 indian renaissance” in ent.) for the 25th anniversary of THE WEEK(dec issue) ..he writes:”thw industry is ready. the talents and skill sets are there.all we need is a responsive, a more informed and a more encouraging govt.” are the talents n skill sets really there?ur past 5 reviews(save the namesake) clearly indicate the opposite…ur take??
you are wrong rs. it was from ‘just married’.
Munimma - can’t recall a remake with “shirtless Sallu” but there was one in Tamil, with Sathyaraj, called Nadigan.
Gaipajama - basically, we got dumped with a whole lot of crap because of the World Cup. All the scheduling was done *before* India crashed out. But now that it’s coming to an end, let’s see. There’s a lot of interesting (at least on paper) stuff coming up. Tara Rum Pum, Khoya Khoya Chand, Cheeni Kum, Blue Umbrella…
Vivek - well, the talent is there. You can’t have a year like 2006 if there was no talent. RDB, LRM, Dor, Ahista Ahista - these things don’t happen by fluke. But there are an equal number of hacks out there, just as in any other film industry in the world.
Alisha - sorry to cut into the cross-talk, but what was “from just married’? I mean, bash me all you want, but at least tell me *what* you’re bashing me about
Baradwaj, I enjoyed your review (as always). I hereby pardon you for the gender-biased statement and accept the clarification you make in the comments section. ‪O:-)
[...but it was not even "from just married" - it was "from water" ;)]
Hi
The name may seem a mystery but I do belong to the gender that is supposed have given up on you. That was a funny comment, rs, just as amusing as Rangan’s reviews. And no, I dont see anything yet that rubs me the wrong way, abt the reviews. Would help, in fact, if I could say enough with Rangan and his reviews…my family would celebrate..I would be sitting with them with my morning cup of tea and not in front of the laptop…all this, btw, is a compliment, Rangan, keep ‘em comments and reviews and cheesy puns pouring in..make me smile.
but yes , there are some people who do mind the gender bias. and i dont think it would go too well with the newspaper reading crowd
you better watch your words , rangan
Oh for crying out loud…
just came back and it’s sure funny to see all these responses
‘just married’ and ‘water’ were definitely not one of your better reviews as far as gender sensitivity goes.
but i still remembered the matribhoomi review and kept coming back.
to enlighten u more on the ‘cross-talk’ in namastey london you said something like: almost makes you wish for the old days, when all it took for the man to bring the woman to her senses was one tight slap
Baradwaj: Thanks for explaining. I got confused because you said Hero’s best friend’s younger brother, which means he would not be the protagonist (or the ‘hero’) but what you really meant was a protagonist who is playing the younger brother of the friend of the ‘flashy’ charac
OT: Bheja fry review wanted….I enjoyed it.
Good job! Your site is great!