<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Jaane Tu Ya Jaane Na / Love Story 2050</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:40:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fahim Farook</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-3/#comment-10041</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahim Farook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-10041</guid>
		<description>I found the review to be very insightful and interesting (and the comments just as interesting) :) Very, very different from the usual review where you don&#039;t carry away much more than when you started with (especially if you&#039;ve already seen the movie in question).

I enjoyed JTYJN and thought it was a refreshing change. I don&#039;t agree with some  (OK, one ...) comment here where it says the humour was badly done and that they know how to package it better in the South. In fact, the problem with most Tamil movies is that the humour track is separate - it&#039;s a parallel story-line most of the time. In JTYJN the humour was part of the main story and I at least thought it worked - I was in stitches towards the end when Jai begin fulfilling the &quot;three conditions&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the review to be very insightful and interesting (and the comments just as interesting) <img src='http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Very, very different from the usual review where you don&#8217;t carry away much more than when you started with (especially if you&#8217;ve already seen the movie in question).</p>
<p>I enjoyed JTYJN and thought it was a refreshing change. I don&#8217;t agree with some  (OK, one &#8230;) comment here where it says the humour was badly done and that they know how to package it better in the South. In fact, the problem with most Tamil movies is that the humour track is separate &#8211; it&#8217;s a parallel story-line most of the time. In JTYJN the humour was part of the main story and I at least thought it worked &#8211; I was in stitches towards the end when Jai begin fulfilling the &#8220;three conditions&#8221; <img src='http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aravind</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-3/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator>Aravind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-7589</guid>
		<description>Finally having seen JTYJN, just managed to catch your review and also go over the 100 rather long comments.

I am surprised nobody mentioned this though. In that Aditi-Jai gang of 6, was it not obvious that Jiggy and Shaleen too were &quot;made-for-each-other&quot;? I was hoping that their characters would be developed eventually (and my hopes raised when Shaleen gets a call about her father in Aditi&#039;s place) and that they would get together by the end! To me, this expectation was what kept these 2 characters afloat.

May be they are yet to realize it and that is what the &quot;wait&quot; at the end of the film signifies?

I know it is too much to expect a reply for the 101th comment on a review of a rather &quot;old&quot; movie but I hope someone will tell me that I am not the only one  imagining a non-existent romance between 2 under-developed characters :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally having seen JTYJN, just managed to catch your review and also go over the 100 rather long comments.</p>
<p>I am surprised nobody mentioned this though. In that Aditi-Jai gang of 6, was it not obvious that Jiggy and Shaleen too were &#8220;made-for-each-other&#8221;? I was hoping that their characters would be developed eventually (and my hopes raised when Shaleen gets a call about her father in Aditi&#8217;s place) and that they would get together by the end! To me, this expectation was what kept these 2 characters afloat.</p>
<p>May be they are yet to realize it and that is what the &#8220;wait&#8221; at the end of the film signifies?</p>
<p>I know it is too much to expect a reply for the 101th comment on a review of a rather &#8220;old&#8221; movie but I hope someone will tell me that I am not the only one  imagining a non-existent romance between 2 under-developed characters <img src='http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biju</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6816</link>
		<dc:creator>Biju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6816</guid>
		<description>Is the PAPU CANT DANCE a joke on Aamir&#039;s dancing skill? This is the rumour going on now. Is it true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the PAPU CANT DANCE a joke on Aamir&#8217;s dancing skill? This is the rumour going on now. Is it true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radhika</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6344</link>
		<dc:creator>Radhika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6344</guid>
		<description>{Jai stops in his tracks and confesses to his mother about his newfound love, and a strange mix of joy and sorrow envelops Savitri’s face. She cups his chin and murmurs, “Silly boy.”}
Sounding a bit nitpickety, but I don&#039;t think that is when she says &quot;silly boy&quot; - she says that later when he tells her Aditi is getting married.

I found some of the themes in the story internally inconsistent - Aditi calls her parents by nicknames (pumpkin?) and they are supposed to uber-cool. Yet, they worry about what biradari will say and are eager to marry her off at 20. The khadoos Mala in the Greek Chorus - was far more interesting when she was khadoos - her rapid meltdown was positively irritating. Why is everyone assuming that love at 20 years has to culminate in immediate marriage? Even the end - I wished they had just returned from an MBA or something, still together, and not from a honeymoon. The coolness is evidently superficial. 

I think Jai likes his life relatively simple - and so Meghna, who may be more interesting is probably also too complex for him - he likes them bland and safe. He looks decidedly uncomfortable in her house at night and in contrast, Aditi&#039;s family offers him another family - a father, a brother - he probably is in love with all that also. 

Ratna Pathak Shah is fabulous - I love her in Sarabhai versus Sarabhai. Her character are so interesting and I loved that she is shown reading books of womens studies by Naomi Wolf and suchlike. Love the detailing.

There were some flitting symbols on the periphery - Sushant and Aditi romance in a victoria - later it is shown clipping by empty. Again, there is a riderless horse floating by when Jai and Meghna are breaking up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{Jai stops in his tracks and confesses to his mother about his newfound love, and a strange mix of joy and sorrow envelops Savitri’s face. She cups his chin and murmurs, “Silly boy.”}<br />
Sounding a bit nitpickety, but I don&#8217;t think that is when she says &#8220;silly boy&#8221; &#8211; she says that later when he tells her Aditi is getting married.</p>
<p>I found some of the themes in the story internally inconsistent &#8211; Aditi calls her parents by nicknames (pumpkin?) and they are supposed to uber-cool. Yet, they worry about what biradari will say and are eager to marry her off at 20. The khadoos Mala in the Greek Chorus &#8211; was far more interesting when she was khadoos &#8211; her rapid meltdown was positively irritating. Why is everyone assuming that love at 20 years has to culminate in immediate marriage? Even the end &#8211; I wished they had just returned from an MBA or something, still together, and not from a honeymoon. The coolness is evidently superficial. </p>
<p>I think Jai likes his life relatively simple &#8211; and so Meghna, who may be more interesting is probably also too complex for him &#8211; he likes them bland and safe. He looks decidedly uncomfortable in her house at night and in contrast, Aditi&#8217;s family offers him another family &#8211; a father, a brother &#8211; he probably is in love with all that also. </p>
<p>Ratna Pathak Shah is fabulous &#8211; I love her in Sarabhai versus Sarabhai. Her character are so interesting and I loved that she is shown reading books of womens studies by Naomi Wolf and suchlike. Love the detailing.</p>
<p>There were some flitting symbols on the periphery &#8211; Sushant and Aditi romance in a victoria &#8211; later it is shown clipping by empty. Again, there is a riderless horse floating by when Jai and Meghna are breaking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6321</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6321</guid>
		<description>And didn&#039;t AK play a character called Ajay Singh Rathore in Sarfarosh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And didn&#8217;t AK play a character called Ajay Singh Rathore in Sarfarosh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6305</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6305</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to add one thing- Jai&#039;s father&#039;s name is Amar Singh Rathod, while Aamir Khan played a character called Amar Damji Rathod in Baazi. Maybe there&#039;s another nod to the uncle there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add one thing- Jai&#8217;s father&#8217;s name is Amar Singh Rathod, while Aamir Khan played a character called Amar Damji Rathod in Baazi. Maybe there&#8217;s another nod to the uncle there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6252</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6252</guid>
		<description>Rahul: Salaam Namaste is a ripoff of the Hollywood movie Nine Months. Maqbool is not a &quot;ripoff&quot;, but it is an adaptation of Shakespeare&#039;s Macbeth, so it&#039;s not entirely &quot;original&quot; either. 

You said &quot;i have seen this tendency among certain section of ppl who always claim that hindi movies are rip off from one or the other south indian movies&quot;. 

Well, don&#039;t shoot the messenger, but a lot of Hindi movies ARE ripoffs, not just of South Indian movies, but they borrow liberally from Hollywood as well. 

For example, a scene in Love Story 2050 with Harman Baweja hanging off the front of a rollercoaster, asking out Priyanka Chopra on a date is reminiscent of a scene in The Notebook. Kismat Konnection is a version of Just My Luck and pretty much anything Priyadarshan does in Hindi is a remake of a Malayalam movie, Bhool Bhulaiya being the most recent one.

That&#039;s not to say every South Indian movie is original (Ghajini for example is a remake of Memento), but the ripoffs or remakes or whatever you want to call them coming out of Bollywood are much more frequent and numerous. Just saying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahul: Salaam Namaste is a ripoff of the Hollywood movie Nine Months. Maqbool is not a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;, but it is an adaptation of Shakespeare&#8217;s Macbeth, so it&#8217;s not entirely &#8220;original&#8221; either. </p>
<p>You said &#8220;i have seen this tendency among certain section of ppl who always claim that hindi movies are rip off from one or the other south indian movies&#8221;. </p>
<p>Well, don&#8217;t shoot the messenger, but a lot of Hindi movies ARE ripoffs, not just of South Indian movies, but they borrow liberally from Hollywood as well. </p>
<p>For example, a scene in Love Story 2050 with Harman Baweja hanging off the front of a rollercoaster, asking out Priyanka Chopra on a date is reminiscent of a scene in The Notebook. Kismat Konnection is a version of Just My Luck and pretty much anything Priyadarshan does in Hindi is a remake of a Malayalam movie, Bhool Bhulaiya being the most recent one.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say every South Indian movie is original (Ghajini for example is a remake of Memento), but the ripoffs or remakes or whatever you want to call them coming out of Bollywood are much more frequent and numerous. Just saying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lax</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6250</link>
		<dc:creator>lax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised why people are going ga-ga over this run-of-the-mill movie. North Indians, I can understand , but the southies have been exposed these &#039;youth&#039; movies for more than a decade now, and better ones, too! The movie was severely lacking in comedy, they could&#039;ve had a blast with the supporting characters, especially the Gujarati dude, hopelessly under-acted. Say what you will about the South movies, they know how to package the masala. Agree with others that the Aditi character was the most under-developed one in the movie, and didnt really care for her one way or the other. The Salman-brothers was some sort of take-off on the Chris Kattan-Will Ferell SNL skit, I believe, didnt work for me at all. The film could&#039;ve used more of Naseer, Paresh etc. About Ratna&#039;s lines that Rangan is going trumpeting, didnt Gopi Desai deliver a variation of that line before in Roop ki Rani..., &quot;Mard, kahin ke&quot;, dont know whats so exciting about.  All in all, worth watching once, but nothing special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised why people are going ga-ga over this run-of-the-mill movie. North Indians, I can understand , but the southies have been exposed these &#8216;youth&#8217; movies for more than a decade now, and better ones, too! The movie was severely lacking in comedy, they could&#8217;ve had a blast with the supporting characters, especially the Gujarati dude, hopelessly under-acted. Say what you will about the South movies, they know how to package the masala. Agree with others that the Aditi character was the most under-developed one in the movie, and didnt really care for her one way or the other. The Salman-brothers was some sort of take-off on the Chris Kattan-Will Ferell SNL skit, I believe, didnt work for me at all. The film could&#8217;ve used more of Naseer, Paresh etc. About Ratna&#8217;s lines that Rangan is going trumpeting, didnt Gopi Desai deliver a variation of that line before in Roop ki Rani&#8230;, &#8220;Mard, kahin ke&#8221;, dont know whats so exciting about.  All in all, worth watching once, but nothing special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6235</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>sagarika, it is reassuring to know that there&#039;s someone else in BR&#039;s comment space who would take up 1000 words to articulate a point worth 2 sentences ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sagarika, it is reassuring to know that there&#8217;s someone else in BR&#8217;s comment space who would take up 1000 words to articulate a point worth 2 sentences <img src='http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagarika</title>
		<link>http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/2008/07/05/review-jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na-love-story-2050/comment-page-2/#comment-6226</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagarika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.desipundit.com/baradwajrangan/?p=258#comment-6226</guid>
		<description>About JTYJN, &quot;The ghost of Dil Chahta Hai, which plays Keith Richards to this movie’s Jack Sparrow&quot; (from &lt;a href=&quot;http://celluloidrant.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ramsu&#039;s review&lt;/a&gt;) makes a wonderful addition to the many movie allusions made here, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About JTYJN, &#8220;The ghost of Dil Chahta Hai, which plays Keith Richards to this movie’s Jack Sparrow&#8221; (from <a href="http://celluloidrant.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/jaane-tu-ya-jaane-na/" rel="nofollow">Ramsu&#8217;s review</a>) makes a wonderful addition to the many movie allusions made here, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.344 seconds -->
