Part Of The Picture: Butterflies are Free
BUTTERFLIES ARE FREE
JAN 9, 2010 – BEFITTING THE TITLE, THERE’S two of everything in this story of Weronika and Véronique (both played by Irène Jacob). To begin with, key motifs are repeated. When we first set eyes on Weronika, she’s a child in Poland, dangling upside down as she contemplates the night sky, which, of course, appears below land. Later, as an adult on a train, she views the countryside speeding past through a refractory glass, which turns the images upside down, the sky – yet again – appearing below land. Then there’s the instance of Weronika speaking over the phone while stationed in front of a mirror – there’s two of her now, the real and the reflected, and soon, there will, very literally, be two of her. As she steps outside and stops in front of a bus, she glimpses Véronique (a tourist from France, who’s boarding the bus) – both attired in the same red scarf, the same red gloves, the same dark overcoat.
The film opens with the voices of two mothers, who eventually recede into the background as two fathers take over raising Weronika and Véronique. Both women are found fidgeting with fastening material – a piece of string that holds a binder together in the case of Weronika, a shoelace in the case of Véronique. Both women slip and fall in the midst of crowds, both get mysterious presents, both gaze at the outside through distorted glass, both are musicians (Weronika is a soprano, Véronique a music teacher), both encounter stooped old women, both use a gold ring to cleanse their eyes – and yet, one aspect of their double lives isn’t doubled. Weronika suffers from a heart ailment but she perseveres with her full-throated singing, not bothering to consult a physician and paying for this oversight with her life, whereas the similarly afflicted Véronique goes to a cardiologist and gives up performing.
Why do Weronika and Véronique differ in this one – and only – significant respect? To get to that, we need to consider the scenes where both women confess to feeling psychically (or perhaps spiritually) connected. Weronika tells her father, “I have a strange feeling. I feel that I’m not alone… That I’m not alone in the world.” Much later, after Weronika’s demise, Véronique admits, “Not long ago, I had a strange sensation. I felt that I was alone. All of a sudden.” Her father intuits, “Someone disappeared from your life.” Véronique nods. “Yes, that’s it.” Apart from that single instance by the bus, Weronika and Véronique have never set eyes on each other, and even then, there was so much chaos around, with rioters and a fleeing public, that they might have shrugged off the sight of the other as an optical illusion. Still, they sense a strange connection to one another.
They are as mystified as we are – until Alexandre (Philippe Volter), a puppeteer, puts on a show at Véronique’s school. The story he narrates is hardly suitable for the young faces in the crowd, but it’s entirely appropriate to the themes of the film. A ballerina dies in the midst of a performance (like Weronika) and she, subsequently, transforms into a butterfly and rises to the heavens. Is Alexandre, therefore, a simple showman, a mere demonstrator of the director’s doppelganger conceit, or is he the great puppeteer in the sky, omniscient to the ways of His world and certainly wiser than we are about the invisible ties that bind Weronika and Véronique? Does He, in His infinite wisdom, sacrifice Weronika for the sake of Véronique’s well-being? Did Weronika, in other words, die so Véronique would learn to heed her heart and, accordingly, reconfigure her life?
It certainly appears so. Towards the end, Véronique approaches Alexandre, who’s at his table, crafting two puppets. “Is that me?” Véronique wonders, and Alexandre replies that it is. But Véronique, like us, is confused. “Why… Why two?” He answers, “Because during performances I handle them a lot. They damage easily.” And he narrates their story. “They were both born in two different cities on two different continents. They both had dark hair and brownish-green eyes. When they were both two years old and already knew how to walk, one of them burned her hand on a stove. A few days later the other one reached out to touch the stove, but pulled away just in time. And yet, she could not have known that she was about to burn herself.” There it is. Apparently, we’re all splintered souls, whispering to our doubles our hard-earned lessons so they can flit through life as blithely as butterflies.
La Double Vie de Véronique (1991, French, Polish, Italian; aka The Double Life of Veronique). Directed by Krzysztof Kieslowski. Starring Irène Jacob, Philippe Volter, Wladyslaw Kowalski.
Copyright ©2010 The New Indian Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Thanks Baradwaj. For another wonderful piece of prose that ‘doubles’ up as lessons in movie-watching. Again, I have not seen the film (or any of Kieslowski’s) but while reading this – didn’t find anything missing. (May be it’s wrong to assume that even if i had seen the film, i wouldn’t have enjoyed the piece more, but i think so.) Bliss!
Did you ever blog about Synecdoche, New York?
(P.S. – My cryptic views about 3 idiots are now posted on my satire blog. Link is with my name on this comment. Would like you to see it.)
Oops. That should be ‘couldn’t have’ instead of ‘wouldn’t have’ there.
Brilliant piece, as usual. Whatta haunting film!
I am really glad you chose the “butteryfly” thing for the title, I thought it was the most brilliantly shot scene in that film. (The first time i watched the film, i couldn’t make much out of it though i liked it instantly).
One more favourite shot is the one in which the soul of one of the girls “leave” the auditorium.
varun: For a second, I was wondering “what cryptic views,” and then I saw the notice
“TT table pe vacuum cleaner se paidaish?” Brilliant! Did you model this after one of those sexologist-quack ads?
Nope, yet to see Synecdoche, New York.
Aravindan: Actually, all of his films are haunting. Like you say, borderline inscrutable on the first viewing (because there’s so much colour coding, and interweaving of visual and aural motifs that become clearer only in subsequent viewings), but impossible to stop watching afterwards. I love the way you put it: “The first time i watched the film, i couldn’t make much out of it though i liked it instantly” – that’s exactly it. You know you haven’t fully “gotten” it, but you’re so smitten by your half-formed notion of the film that you can’t wait to get back to watching it.
Red, White Blue, Veronique are my all desert-island films (I still haven’t watched the entire Decalogue) — in the sense that they are certainly “art films” but so beautiful and human that I consider him and Almodovar the only two art-film makers of the past few decades who brought back the “glamour” of art cinema, which had vanished after Fellini-Bergman and that gang.
About the shot of the girl leaving the auditorium, Paul Thomas Anderson did something similar in the fake-exorcism scene in There Will Be Blood.
Yes BR,
I like clicking such crazy ads…so had one Bengali Baba ad with ‘Duaa bhi takdeer badal sakti hai’ tagline. Just did some tweaking to that, though retained the essence. Thanks for watching!
And how can I get your email id? Would like to share some more film writing.
Sounds like a uncommonly thoughtful film. Thanks for bringing it to our notice.
This was the movie that hooked me onto Kieslowski’s films. Every single one of them is a painfully crafted piece of art, that I feel needs multiple viewing to unearth all its layers and beauty. His craftiness in blending beautiful imagery and music along with, almost philosophic content has no parallels among his peers, at least in my opinion.
Just as how there is two of everything here, he has lots of symmetric elements/repeat-motifs in many of his movies (ex: the old lady trying to dispose a bottle, the music of fictitious Van den Budanmyer appearing in the three colors trilogy) enticing us to unearth those patterns like a cryptic crossword. No wonder that he retired a content man after doing the trilogy.
Thanks for reminding me of the beautiful elements in this gem of a film, with a description as beautiful as the imagery Kieslowski conjures up.
On a side note, if you haven’t seen his “Talking heads” documentary, I highly recommend it. It’s on You tube: http://bit.ly/7sK7Xk
Irene Jacob could stake her entire reputation on her two performances for Kieslowski – Veronique and Red. She’s almost impossibly beautiful, and yet somehow, her characters remain believable, compelling.